ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN

sunscreen • For 0-6 month old infants • Skin contact 🧴

sunscreen

Product Images

Product Photo

ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN - Front

Tap to enlarge

Ingredient List

ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN - Ingredients

Tap to enlarge

Is this safe for 0-6 month old newborns to use ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN?

🚫
NO - AVOID
Danger Score: 69 (Lower is safer)
Quick Answer: ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN contains 33 ingredients. 4 avoid, 4 concerning, 11 caution. Avoid - Contains Dangerous Ingredients 🚫 Always consult your pediatrician for newborns.

Check for Different Age (6 available)

Ingredients Analysis (33 found)

octisalate
🚫9/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months) octisalate is not recommended. It can get into a baby’s bloodstream through the skin, and there are reports of allergic reactions and possible effects on developing hormones in studies.
Absorbed - Studies show octisalate can get through skin and raise blood levels after normal use. This includes lab skin tests and a randomized clinical trial that measured the ingredient in blood, and notes that it can also act as a penetration enhancer. The finding and the contamination note about salicylic acid mean it can reach the body and carry other substances with it.
Immune system - There are human case reports of allergic contact reactions to octisalate, showing it can trigger immune responses in some people (published dermatology case studies). These reports point to real allergy risk for sensitive children.
Eczema - Published contact‑dermatitis case studies link octisalate to rash and eczema‑like reactions in people who are sensitive, so it can trigger or worsen eczema in some children.
Irritant - Clinical case reports and safety reviews note skin irritation and contact sensitivity from octisalate in some users, so it can cause redness, itching or rashes on sensitive baby skin.
Banned - Some safety panels and regulators place limits on how octisalate is used. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (industry safety panel) sets concentration/use qualifications, and a national health authority set a concentration limit for some product types in its country, so its use is restricted in some places.
Environmental - A national environmental agency has flagged octisalate as a suspected environmental toxin, so it may harm wildlife or ecosystems if released widely.
Confidence: HIGH
avobenzone
🚫8/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months old: avoid products that list avobenzone when you can. Avobenzone can get into the skin and the ingredient record shows possible contaminant chemicals and some limits on use in other countries, so we are cautious with very young infants.
Absorbed - Studies and a clinical trial show avobenzone can get through skin and be measured in the blood. This means it can be absorbed into a child's body after topical use (clinical plasma concentration study; transdermal penetration research).
Banned - Some authorities limit how avobenzone can be used. For example, Japan has rules that restrict its use or set concentration limits in cosmetics, so some products must follow those limits.
Long-Term Risk - The ingredient record flags high contamination concerns and lists possible impurities (for example benzoic acid, 4‑t‑butylbenzoic acid, benzaldehyde, p‑anisic acid, acetophenone, and dibenzoylmethane). These contaminants can raise long‑term health questions if present repeatedly over time.
Confidence: HIGH
octocrylene
🚫8/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months), avoid products that list octocrylene when possible. Babies have very thin, sensitive skin and this ingredient can get into the body and has been linked in studies to irritation, allergic reactions, and lab findings that raise concern.
Absorbed - Multiple studies, including a recent randomized clinical trial and skin absorption lab studies, show octocrylene can get through the skin and enter the body. This means it can travel beyond the surface of the skin and reach the bloodstream.
Builds Up - Field and lab research found octocrylene in fish from rivers and peer‑reviewed work reports it can accumulate in animal tissues and people. This means repeated use can lead to the ingredient building up over time.
Immune system - Clinical case reports and a review of contact and photocontact allergy show octocrylene can cause allergic skin reactions in some people. That is a real immune response risk, especially for sensitive skin.
Organ Risk - Laboratory studies report octocrylene can produce excess reactive oxygen species that harm cells, cause mutations, and have been linked to heart-related effects in experimental work. These cellular effects can harm organs with repeated exposure.
Long-Term Risk - Because octocrylene can be absorbed, can accumulate in tissues, and can cause cellular damage in lab studies, there is concern about possible health effects after repeated long-term exposure.
Environmental - Environmental studies found octocrylene in rivers and showed it accumulates in marine organisms and can harm coral cells and mitochondria. This indicates a risk to wildlife and ecosystems when the chemical enters waterways.
Confidence: HIGH
triethanolamine
🚫8/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months) this ingredient is best avoided if you can. It can irritate sensitive baby skin and has a known risk of causing allergic reactions in some people. There is also a contamination concern (nitrosamines) during manufacturing.
Immune system - Multiple safety reviews note that triethanolamine shows evidence of immune and allergy effects in people, including reports of immune system or allergy concerns and respiratory allergic reactions (noted by cosmetic safety reviewers and occupational health assessments). This means it can affect the immune response in children who are exposed.
Irritant - A cosmetic safety review found strong evidence that triethanolamine is a human skin toxicant or allergen. That means it can cause skin redness, itching, or rashes—especially on sensitive or young skin.
Asthma - An occupational health review lists triethanolamine as a human respiratory toxicant or allergen, so inhalation or skin exposure may worsen breathing problems or trigger asthma-like responses in sensitive children.
Eczema - Because triethanolamine is reported as a skin allergen/toxicant, it can trigger or worsen eczema and similar skin conditions in babies and children prone to eczema.
Organ Risk - A national environmental agency classifies triethanolamine as expected to be toxic or harmful to non-reproductive organs, and regulatory toxicology notes animal studies showing effects at moderate doses. Repeated or high exposures could harm organs such as the liver or kidneys.
Banned - Cosmetic safety reviews and regional cosmetic rules place limits on how this ingredient may be used and at what concentrations, and some regulations restrict its use in certain products. This means some countries impose legal use or concentration limits.
Cancer - There is a high-listed concern about contamination with nitrosamines (a class of chemicals linked to cancer). While the ingredient itself is not judged likely to cause cancer, the potential for nitrosamine contamination raises a cancer-related risk from impurities.
Confidence: MEDIUM
chlorphenesin
🚨7/10
For newborns and babies up to 6 months, chlorphenesin is something to avoid when you can. It is a preservative that has been linked to allergic skin reactions and some irritation in people, and some countries limit or prohibit its use in certain products.
Immune system - Moderate evidence shows chlorphenesin can cause skin allergy and immune effects in people and animals, as found by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review and supporting animal studies.
Irritant - There is limited to moderate evidence that chlorphenesin can irritate skin, eyes, and the respiratory tract, based on assessments from a European chemical agency and the Cosmetic Ingredient Review.
Organ Risk - A European chemicals authority has classified chlorphenesin as potentially toxic or harmful to non-reproductive organs, indicating a real organ-health concern despite differing views from other agencies.
Banned - Use of chlorphenesin is restricted or prohibited for some cosmetic uses under rules set by the Japan Ministry of Health, showing it is limited by regulators in at least one country.
Builds Up - A published review flagged chlorphenesin as persistent and bioaccumulative with moderate-to-high toxicity potential, which means it may stay in the body or environment over time.
Environmental - Some scientific review raised concerns about persistence and toxicity to people and the environment, indicating possible environmental harm even though some agencies did not find the same risk.
Eczema - Because there is moderate evidence that chlorphenesin can cause skin allergy and irritation in people, it may trigger or worsen eczema and other sensitive-skin conditions.
Asthma - Limited evidence of respiratory irritation suggests chlorphenesin could make breathing problems or asthma worse in sensitive children.
Long-Term Risk - Given reports of persistence, bioaccumulation, and moderate toxicity, there is a plausible risk of long-term health effects after repeated or long-term exposure.
Confidence: MEDIUM
phenoxyethanol
🚨7/10
For infants (0–6 months): be careful. This preservative can irritate delicate baby skin and some countries limit how it’s used. It is not known to cause cancer or birth defects at normal cosmetic levels, but irritation is the main concern.
Irritant - Official hazard listings show this chemical can cause skin, eye, and lung irritation. Regulators classify it as an irritant, so it can make skin red or itchy and bother the eyes or breathing passages.
Asthma - Because it can irritate the lungs, it may make asthma or breathing problems worse. Workplace and hazard listings note lung irritation and limits on inhalation exposure.
Organ Risk - There is limited evidence that it can affect the nervous system and it is listed as toxic/harmful in official hazard codes. That means repeated or high exposures could harm organs like the nervous system.
Absorbed - Safety reviews and workplace data note systemic effects tied to how it is used, and nervous-system findings suggest the chemical can get into the body after skin or workplace exposure.
Banned - Some governments set limits on its use in cosmetics (for example, concentration limits from national health authorities), and some product standards require special proof before it can be used.
Confidence: MEDIUM
acrylates/dimethicone copolymer
🚨6/10
For infants (newborns and babies 0–6 months): this ingredient is not well studied in very young babies. The ingredient itself shows low direct hazards in many checks, but experts have flagged contamination with other silicone chemicals. Because a baby’s skin is delicate, we recommend being cautious.
Banned - The ingredient record lists high contamination concerns naming cyclotetrasiloxane (D4) and cyclopentasiloxane (D5). European regulators and chemical agencies have restricted or phased out these siloxanes in some cosmetics and personal care uses, so products contaminated with them can be restricted or banned in certain places.
Environmental - Regulators have flagged D4 and D5 as harmful to the environment. These chemicals do not break down easily and can damage aquatic life, so contamination of this ingredient could harm waterways when washed off.
Builds Up - D4 and D5 are known to accumulate in animals and the environment over time. Because this ingredient can contain those contaminants, repeated use can add to that buildup.
Long-Term Risk - Because the named contaminants are persistent and bioaccumulative, regulators treat them as long-term hazards. Their presence raises concerns about long-term environmental and health effects with repeated exposure.
Confidence: LOW
PEG-100 stearate
🚨6/10
For infants (0-6 months): PEG-100 Stearate is an ingredient used to help oil and water mix in lotions. By itself it usually causes little irritation, but there is a risk that it can carry small amounts of harmful manufacturing impurities (like ethylene oxide and 1,4-dioxane). Because babies' skin is thin and we have limited safety studies in newborns, it's best to be careful.
Cancer - The ingredient record lists contamination with ethylene oxide and 1,4‑dioxane. These contaminants are linked with cancer risk, and the ingredient's safety notes flag those contamination concerns (noted in industry safety review information).
Environmental - A government assessment named in the ingredient record flags this substance as a suspected environmental toxin, meaning it may harm wildlife or ecosystems if released.
Long-Term Risk - Industry safety reviews for this ingredient note data gaps and that safety assessments relied on related chemicals. Combined with the contamination concerns, this means there may be unknown long-term health risks from repeated use.
Confidence: MEDIUM
poly C10-30 alkyl acrylate
⚠️5/10
This ingredient is used to thicken creams and wipes. For most adults it shows low concern, but for newborns and babies under 6 months we are more careful because there have been reports of possible contamination with harmful chemicals. Baby skin is thin and can be more affected.
Cancer - The ingredient record flags high contamination concerns, including benzene. Benzene is listed by international cancer authorities as a known human carcinogen, so if benzene is present as a contaminant it raises a real cancer risk with repeated or high exposure.
Irritant - An independent cosmetic safety review (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) notes possible skin, eye, and lung irritation. The ingredient’s contamination list also includes acrylic and methacrylic acids, which can cause local irritation, so irritation is a real concern for sensitive baby skin or breathing.
Long-Term Risk - Because the ingredient is flagged for contamination by chemicals like benzene and acrylic-type acids, there is potential for harmful effects to develop over time with repeated use or exposure to those contaminants.
Confidence: LOW
styrene/acrylates copolymer
⚠️5/10
For newborns and babies under 6 months: this ingredient is generally considered low risk in finished products, but there are concerns about possible leftover acrylic chemicals and very little data on how these affect babies' thin skin. Because infants absorb more through their skin, we recommend caution.
Irritant - The ingredient record flags high contamination concerns with methacrylic acid and acrylic acid. Those chemicals are known to cause skin irritation and burns in safety data, so contaminated batches could make a baby’s skin red, sore, or painful. The ingredient’s safety notes also say its safety assumptions depend on low absorption (Cosmetic Ingredient Review).
Immune system - The assessment lists 2‑ethylhexyl acrylate as a possible contaminant. That chemical is a known skin sensitizer in toxicology and safety reports, so contamination could trigger allergic reactions or longer‑term sensitization. The ingredient record’s contamination concern is marked high, while industry safety notes rely on formulation limits (Cosmetic Ingredient Review).
Eczema - Because the ingredient may contain acrylic and methacrylic monomers and 2‑ethylhexyl acrylate, contaminants that commonly trigger or worsen contact dermatitis, use on babies with eczema could make symptoms worse. The ingredient information specifically lists these contaminants as a high concern.
Confidence: MEDIUM
caprylyl methicone
⚠️4/10
For newborns and babies (0–6 months), caprylyl methicone is usually low risk on its own, but there are concerns about possible contamination with other silicone chemicals and some animal studies that found problems at higher doses. Because baby skin is thin, we recommend extra caution.
Hormones - Animal safety reviews found signs of endocrine disruption at moderate doses. That means this ingredient has shown effects on hormone systems in lab studies, so it could affect natural hormone development in children (based on Cosmetic Ingredient Review findings).
Confuse Hormones - Animal studies reported endocrine effects at non‑low doses, which suggests the ingredient can act like or interfere with normal hormone signals. This may confuse developing hormone systems (based on Cosmetic Ingredient Review findings).
Organ Risk - Animal data show metabolic and other organ effects at moderate to high doses. That means repeated or high exposure in tests changed how organs work in animals (based on Cosmetic Ingredient Review findings).
Immune system - Animal studies showed circulatory or allergenic effects at moderate to high doses, meaning the ingredient has caused immune or allergy-type responses in tests (based on Cosmetic Ingredient Review findings).
Irritant - Lab studies reported skin irritation at high doses and eye irritation at moderate doses. This ingredient can cause redness, itching, or eye irritation in test animals, so it may irritate sensitive baby skin.
Environmental - There are high contamination concerns listing cyclopentasiloxane and cyclotetrasiloxane as possible contaminants. Those specific silicone contaminants are known to raise environmental and regulatory worries, so contamination risk is elevated.
Confidence: MEDIUM
dimethicone
⚠️4/10
Safety information not properly formatted for easy understanding
Builds Up - Regulators have said some forms are persistent and can bioaccumulate in people and wildlife. A REACH substance evaluation and Environment Canada findings name persistence and bioaccumulation as a concern, so this ingredient (or its related siloxanes) can build up over time.
Environmental - Environment Canada flagged this chemistry as suspected to harm the environment. The same evaluations note persistence in wildlife, meaning it can stay in nature and affect animals and ecosystems.
Organ Risk - An assessment by Environment Canada classified non-reproductive organ system toxicity as a concern, meaning repeated exposure may harm organs (for example, liver or kidneys) according to that regulator.
Banned - Some related siloxanes listed as contaminants (for example, cyclopentasiloxane / cyclotetrasiloxane and similar substances) have been heavily restricted by regulators under REACH and by other national reviews. Industry safety reviews also recommend limits or product-type restrictions.
Long-Term Risk - Because parts of this class are persistent and regulators and industry panels recommend use limits, there is a potential for long-term harms from repeated use or environmental build-up, as noted in REACH and Cosmetic Ingredient Review summaries.
Confidence: MEDIUM
niacinamide
⚠️4/10
Niacinamide is a mild form of vitamin B3 that is usually low risk. For newborns and babies (0–6 months) we recommend being careful because their skin soaks up things more easily.
No Known Risk - Major government and expert reviews find niacinamide to be low risk for normal topical use. A national environmental health agency classifies it as not expected to be harmful to organs or the environment. The U.S. food regulator allows limited uses in food, and an independent cosmetic safety panel has set recommended concentration limits after review. While a few animal studies at very high doses reported tumor findings and reviewers note some data gaps about maximum ‘as-used’ concentrations, the overall conclusion from these agencies and safety panels is that routine topical use poses no significant known health risks.
Confidence: MEDIUM
PEG-8 laurate
⚠️4/10
For infants (0–6 months) this ingredient should be treated with caution. It can cause skin reactions in some people and the ingredient report raises concerns about possible contamination with small amounts of unsafe chemicals. Newborn and baby skin is more sensitive and can absorb more, so avoid routine use when possible.
Immune system - Studies show PEG-8 laurate can act as a skin allergen in people. The ingredient data cites peer-reviewed literature that found strong evidence of skin allergy or immune reaction, so this can affect a child’s immune response at the skin level.
Irritant - There is strong evidence from published studies that this ingredient can cause skin toxic effects such as redness, itching or rashes. Because it is flagged as a human skin toxicant, it may irritate sensitive baby skin.
Eczema - Because PEG-8 laurate is identified in the literature as a human skin allergen/toxicant, it can trigger or worsen eczema or similar skin conditions in children with sensitive skin.
Cancer - The ingredient data flags high contamination concerns for ethylene oxide and 1,4-dioxane. Those contaminants are known in scientific and regulatory literature to be linked with cancer risk, so contamination during manufacture can raise long-term cancer concerns.
Long-Term Risk - Safety reviews note data gaps and qualified use limits in industry safety assessments (Cosmetic Ingredient Review). Combined with the contamination concerns above, there is a possible long-term health risk from repeated exposure over time.
Confidence: MEDIUM
sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate
⚠️4/10
This ingredient is a cleaning agent found in some soaps and cleansers. Overall safety reviews say it has low long-term health concerns, but it can irritate skin and eyes. For newborns and infants (0–6 months), their skin is very delicate, so it's best to avoid it when possible.
Confidence: MEDIUM
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate
⚠️4/10
For newborns and young babies (0–6 months) this ingredient is generally considered low risk in adult tests, but we are cautious. Studies show it can make skin absorb more and has caused irritation in animals, so it’s best to avoid regular use on very young babies.
Absorbed - Peer‑reviewed studies identify this chemical as a penetration enhancer. That means it can help other ingredients pass through the skin and enter the bloodstream, which raises how much a child can absorb from a product.
Irritant - Animal studies in the peer‑reviewed literature show eye irritation at high doses and skin irritation at moderate doses. On sensitive baby skin this could cause redness, stinging, or a rash.
Cancer - Lab tests on mammal cells reported mutation‑positive results in peer‑reviewed work. That finding raises a possible cancer concern, though it comes from cell studies rather than human tests.
Organ Risk - Peer‑reviewed animal studies found effects on the pancreas at high doses. This shows the ingredient can harm internal organs under strong or repeated exposure in those studies.
Fertility - Peer‑reviewed animal studies report developmental or reproductive effects at high doses. That suggests a possible risk to development or future fertility with large or repeated exposures in those tests.
Long-Term Risk - Taken together, cell tests showing mutations and animal studies showing organ and reproductive effects (all from peer‑reviewed sources) point to possible long‑term health concerns if exposure is repeated over time.
Confidence: MEDIUM
amosalate
⚠️4/10
Amosalate is not a recognized ingredient name it might be a misreading or typo of amiloxate or amsosalate which are sunscreen agents but unclear here
Confidence: HIGH
diethylhexyl syringylidenemalonate
⚠️4/10
Cannot understand what diethylhexyl syringylidenemalonate is it might be a misreading or a typo no clear safety data available
Confidence: HIGH
inulin lauryl carbamate
⚠️4/10
Inulin lauryl carbamate is not a recognized ingredient in cosmetic or baby products databases. It may be a misreading or typo.
Confidence: HIGH
p-anisic acid
✅3/10
For infants (0–6 months): overall this ingredient appears to be low risk in adults, but there is little specific information for newborns and very young babies. Because baby skin and breathing are more sensitive, extra caution is recommended.
Confidence: LOW
polymethylsilsesquioxane
✅3/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months), this ingredient is generally low risk in adults, but there is little direct data for babies. Because baby skin is delicate, we treat it more cautiously.
No Known Risk - Available safety reviews show no health concerns above a low level. Animal tests noted skin irritation only at high doses in lab studies, and checks for cancer, development, and immune harm were rated low. Some product-verification programs ask for extra proof before allowing this ingredient, but overall no real child health risks were identified.
Confidence: LOW
potassium cetyl phosphate
✅3/10
Safety information not properly formatted for easy understanding
No Known Risk - Regulatory safety reviews and lab tests find no health risks above a low level for normal topical use. Tests show only limited, mild skin or eye irritation in some studies and no signs of genetic damage or cancer risk; experts say it is safe in cosmetics when used within set limits. Because no concern was rated above low, there are no real, confirmed risks for typical use on children’s skin.
Confidence: LOW
tocopherol
✅3/10
For newborns and babies (0–6 months): tocopherol (vitamin E) is usually low risk when used in small amounts on the skin, but baby skin is very delicate. There are some safety notes about possible contamination and a rare chance of skin allergy, so take extra care with infants and newborns.
Confidence: MEDIUM
acrylates/C10-30 alkyl acrylate crosspolymer
✅2/10
For infants (0–6 months): generally low risk. This ingredient is a thickener that usually does not get into the skin, but there are notes that trace manufacturing contaminants (methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, benzene) can be present. Because babies’ skin is very delicate, we recommend extra caution.
Confidence: MEDIUM
caprylyl glycol
✅2/10
For infants (newborns and babies 0–6 months), Caprylyl Glycol is usually low risk when it’s in baby lotions, wipes, or creams at low amounts. Most babies won’t have a problem, but newborn skin is more sensitive so we recommend extra caution.
No Known Risk - Government and industry safety reviews found no clear health hazards for skin use. Tests say it is not likely to build up in the body, not persistent in the environment, and not harmful to organs. Industry reviewers do note limits on how much can be used and some data gaps, but overall the ingredient is rated low concern for topical use.
Confidence: HIGH
glycerin
✅2/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): glycerin is a common, mild moisturizer found in many baby lotions and wipes. When used at normal levels in products made for babies, it is usually safe and well tolerated.
Confidence: HIGH
glyceryl stearate
✅2/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months: this ingredient is commonly used in baby lotions and is usually low risk. Still, baby skin is thinner and soaks up things more easily than older children, so extra care is wise.
Confidence: MEDIUM
silica
✅2/10
Silica is used as an absorbent or anti-caking agent and is generally considered safe for topical use but data for infants under 6 months is limited
Confidence: MEDIUM
caprylic/capric triglyceride
✅1/10
This ingredient is a gentle, lightweight oil used to moisturize skin. For newborns and babies (0–6 months) it is generally safe when used in normal baby lotions or wipes.
Confidence: HIGH
panthenol
✅1/10
Panthenol (provitamin B5) is generally safe for infants and newborns. It helps moisturize and soothe baby skin and is rarely irritating. Studies and government reviews do not show it to be toxic when used on skin.
No Known Risk - Health and regulatory reviews (including Canadian and U.S. assessments and industry safety panels) find panthenol has no reported hazards above a low level for topical use. It is not expected to harm organs, does not appear to build up in the body or the environment, and common concerns (cancer, allergies, reproductive effects) were rated low. There are some industry notes about safe use levels and a few data gaps, but no higher-level health risks were identified.
Confidence: HIGH
sodium hyaluronate
✅1/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months, sodium hyaluronate is usually safe. It helps skin hold water and is not commonly linked to allergies, cancer, or growth problems.
No Known Risk - Major safety reviews and government checks report low concern for this ingredient when used on the skin. Industry safety reviewers note some data gaps and recommend limits on how much may be used in products, and a government environmental review flagged uncertain effects on the environment. Some product-verification programs also require extra proof before allowing it. Taken together, there are no clear health risks above a low level in the available assessments.
Confidence: MEDIUM
xanthan gum
✅1/10
For babies 0–6 months (newborns and infants): xanthan gum is generally very safe when used in skincare like wipes or lotions. It’s a thickener that usually sits on the skin and rarely causes problems.
No Known Risk - Safety reviews and regulatory assessments find no health hazards above a low level for topical use. It is approved for limited use in food, classified as not expected to be toxic and a low human-health priority, and not suspected to be an environmental toxin. Cosmetic industry reviewers note only guidance on concentrations or purity. Because no concern was rated above low, no specific risks were identified for babies or children.
Confidence: HIGH
water
✅0/10
Water is very safe for a newborn’s or baby’s skin. Tests and regulatory reviews find no meaningful health risks from water used on the skin.
No Known Risk - Regulatory reviews (Environment Canada) find plain water is not expected to be toxic, not bioaccumulative, and not an environmental toxin. Safety summaries list no concerns above a low level for organ harm, reproductive effects, or other long‑term risks for topical use, so no specific health risks are identified for use on skin.
Confidence: HIGH

Common Questions About ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN

Is this newborn-safe? ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN

ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN is not recommended for 0-6 month old babies due to potentially harmful ingredients.

What ingredients should I watch out for?

We analyzed 33 ingredients in ANTHELIOS KIDS GENTLE LOTION SUNSCREEN. 4 avoid, 4 concerning, 11 caution. Check the detailed analysis above for specific concerns.

When can newborns start using sunscreen?

The appropriate age depends on the specific ingredients. This analysis is for 0-6 month old babies. Use the age selector above to check other ages.

⚠️ Important Disclaimers

Product Recognition: Product names are identified programatically and may be incorrect. Always verify product identity yourself.

Safety Analysis: Evaluations are for research only - consult pediatricians for medical decisions. Do not rely solely on this analysis.

No Guarantees: Results may be incomplete or inaccurate. Do not rely solely on this analysis.