CURLS & WAVES

shampoo & bodywash & conditioner • For 0-6 month old infantsSkin contact 🧴

shampoo & bodywash & conditioner

Product Images

Product Photo

CURLS & WAVES - Front

Tap to enlarge

Ingredient List

CURLS & WAVES - Ingredients

Tap to enlarge

Is this safe for 0-6 month old newborns to use CURLS & WAVES?

🚫
NO - AVOID
Danger Score: 85 (Lower is safer)
Quick Answer: CURLS & WAVES contains 26 ingredients. 1 avoid, 11 concerning, 7 caution. Avoid - Contains Dangerous Ingredients 🚫 Always consult your pediatrician for newborns.

Check for Different Age (6 available)

Ingredients Analysis (26 found)

Didecyldimonium Chloride
🚫9/10
Didecyldimonium Chloride is a disinfectant and can be toxic or irritating to infant skin not safe for 0-6 months topical use likely used as preservative
Irritant - Didecyldimonium chloride is a quaternary ammonium compound known to cause skin irritation, especially with prolonged or repeated contact. Babies have more sensitive skin, increasing the risk.
Absorbed - Quaternary ammonium compounds like didecyldimonium chloride can be absorbed through the skin, especially when used topically, raising concerns about systemic exposure in babies.
Confidence: HIGH
Acetamide MEA
🚨7/10
For newborns and babies under 6 months, Acetamide MEA is not recommended in products that stay on the skin. Expert reviewers limit its use because it can irritate skin or eyes, and there isn’t good safety information for very young infants.
Banned - A recognized cosmetic safety review panel (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) flags this ingredient as needing limits. They say it is restricted for use in cosmetics, is unsafe in products left on the skin, and may only be used with specific concentration or product-type limits. That means it can be banned or tightly limited in some places and should not be used in leave-on baby products.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Chlorphenesin
🚨7/10
For newborns and babies up to 6 months, chlorphenesin is something to avoid when you can. It is a preservative that has been linked to allergic skin reactions and some irritation in people, and some countries limit or prohibit its use in certain products.
Immune system - Moderate evidence shows chlorphenesin can cause skin allergy and immune effects in people and animals, as found by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review and supporting animal studies.
Irritant - There is limited to moderate evidence that chlorphenesin can irritate skin, eyes, and the respiratory tract, based on assessments from a European chemical agency and the Cosmetic Ingredient Review.
Organ Risk - A European chemicals authority has classified chlorphenesin as potentially toxic or harmful to non-reproductive organs, indicating a real organ-health concern despite differing views from other agencies.
Banned - Use of chlorphenesin is restricted or prohibited for some cosmetic uses under rules set by the Japan Ministry of Health, showing it is limited by regulators in at least one country.
Builds Up - A published review flagged chlorphenesin as persistent and bioaccumulative with moderate-to-high toxicity potential, which means it may stay in the body or environment over time.
Environmental - Some scientific review raised concerns about persistence and toxicity to people and the environment, indicating possible environmental harm even though some agencies did not find the same risk.
Eczema - Because there is moderate evidence that chlorphenesin can cause skin allergy and irritation in people, it may trigger or worsen eczema and other sensitive-skin conditions.
Asthma - Limited evidence of respiratory irritation suggests chlorphenesin could make breathing problems or asthma worse in sensitive children.
Long-Term Risk - Given reports of persistence, bioaccumulation, and moderate toxicity, there is a plausible risk of long-term health effects after repeated or long-term exposure.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Phenoxyethanol
🚨7/10
For infants (0–6 months): be careful. This preservative can irritate delicate baby skin and some countries limit how it’s used. It is not known to cause cancer or birth defects at normal cosmetic levels, but irritation is the main concern.
Irritant - Official hazard listings show this chemical can cause skin, eye, and lung irritation. Regulators classify it as an irritant, so it can make skin red or itchy and bother the eyes or breathing passages.
Asthma - Because it can irritate the lungs, it may make asthma or breathing problems worse. Workplace and hazard listings note lung irritation and limits on inhalation exposure.
Organ Risk - There is limited evidence that it can affect the nervous system and it is listed as toxic/harmful in official hazard codes. That means repeated or high exposures could harm organs like the nervous system.
Absorbed - Safety reviews and workplace data note systemic effects tied to how it is used, and nervous-system findings suggest the chemical can get into the body after skin or workplace exposure.
Banned - Some governments set limits on its use in cosmetics (for example, concentration limits from national health authorities), and some product standards require special proof before it can be used.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Polyquaternium-7
🚨7/10
For infants and newborns (0–6 months), this ingredient is best avoided when possible. There is limited information for babies this young and some official reviews raise contamination and restriction concerns.
Cancer - The ingredient record flags contamination with acrylamide. Acrylamide is a toxic contaminant and its presence in the ingredient raises a real cancer concern reported in the safety record.
Organ Risk - A government assessment listed this polymer as expected to be toxic or harmful to non-reproductive organs, indicating possible harm to organs like liver, kidneys, or lungs with repeated exposure.
Banned - This ingredient is restricted for use in cosmetics under the EU Cosmetics Directive and is limited by industry safety rules, so it may be banned or heavily limited in some countries or products.
Environmental - Government data flagged this substance as a suspected environmental toxin, suggesting it may harm wildlife or ecosystems if released.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Tetrasodium EDTA
🚨7/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months: try to avoid products that list Tetrasodium EDTA. It is usually used in tiny amounts and is not linked to cancer or birth defects, but it can irritate sensitive skin and can make the skin take in more of other ingredients. That makes it riskier for infants with very thin, developing skin.
Irritant - This ingredient is officially classed as an irritant by the EU GHS hazard codes. That means it can cause skin or eye redness, itch, or breathing irritation if it touches skin or is breathed in.
Organ Risk - Environment Canada lists this chemical as expected to be toxic or harmful to non-reproductive body systems and gives it a medium human-health priority. That signals a real risk of harm to organs (for example liver or kidneys) with harmful exposures.
Absorbed - A cosmetic safety panel (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) identifies this ingredient as a penetration enhancer. That means it can help other substances, and itself, get through the skin into the body.
Long-Term Risk - Workplace limits and the medium health-priority classification (reported by regulators) indicate caution for repeated or long-term exposure. Those findings suggest possible health effects after years of exposure.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Acrylates Copolymer
🚨6/10
For newborns and babies up to 6 months: this ingredient is commonly used to make creams and lotions hold together. On its own it has low flags for things like cancer or allergies, but the main worry is that products with it can sometimes contain harmful impurities. Because babies’ skin is very thin and absorbs more, it’s safer to avoid this ingredient in products for infants when possible.
Cancer - The ingredient's contamination list flags benzene as a possible impurity. Benzene is a known cancer-causing chemical, so if present as a contaminant it could raise cancer risk with repeated or high exposure. This concern comes from the ingredient's listed contamination findings.
Organ Risk - The contamination list also includes chemicals (benzene, acrylic and methacrylic acid, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate) that can harm organs or blood-forming tissues with exposure. These impurities are called out in the ingredient information and can affect internal organs if they get into the body.
Long-Term Risk - Because the ingredient can be contaminated with persistent toxic chemicals, the data warns of a higher contamination concern. Industry safety reviews and ingredient guidance note limits and impurity control, which means repeated use could carry longer-term health risks if contaminants are present.
Confidence: LOW
Cocamidopropyl Betaine
🚨6/10
For infants (0–6 months) this cleansing ingredient is commonly used in washes and wipes but should be used with care. It can sometimes irritate or cause allergic reactions, and some batches can carry trace contaminants. Babies’ skin is more delicate, so caution is advised.
Immune system - Cosmetic safety reviews (Cosmetic Ingredient Review and draft safety reports) report limited evidence that cocamidopropyl betaine can sensitize skin or trigger allergic reactions. That means it can affect the immune system in some people, especially those with sensitive skin.
Irritant - Industry safety assessments note limited evidence of skin sensitization and explicitly warn the ingredient may be unsafe in products left on the skin (not rinsed off). This shows it can cause redness, itching, or irritation for some users.
Eczema - Safety panels and reports observed cases of sensitization and recommend limits on use and product types. Because it can provoke skin reactions, it may trigger or worsen eczema in sensitive children.
Cancer - Regulatory and industry reviews flag contamination concerns for this ingredient, including nitrosamines and related amines. Nitrosamines are known to be carcinogenic, so impurity risks raise a cancer concern unless impurities are controlled as industry reviewers recommend.
Banned - Expert panels and tentative regulatory reports recommend use, concentration, and manufacturing restrictions for this ingredient and note it is unsafe in some product types (leave-on). While not universally banned, it is subject to regulatory or industry limits in some contexts.
Environmental - A national environmental agency (Environment Canada) flagged this ingredient as a suspected environmental toxin, indicating possible harm to ecosystems if released into the environment.
Confidence: MEDIUM
PEG-150 Distearate
🚨6/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months) this ingredient is something to be careful with. On its own it is not flagged as highly dangerous, but there are worries about possible contaminants and there isn’t much safety testing specifically in babies.
Cancer - Safety reviews flag high contamination concerns for this ingredient. Small impurity molecules named in the ingredient record (ethylene oxide and 1,4‑dioxane) are specifically listed as contaminants of concern by industry and regulatory safety reviews. Those contaminants are linked to cancer risk, so cancer is a real risk to note.
Long-Term Risk - The ingredient record shows a high contamination concern and also notes gaps in the safety assessment used by industry reviewers. Because the worry is about persistent impurities that can cause harm over time, there is a meaningful long‑term health risk if contaminated product is used repeatedly.
Banned - Industry and regulatory safety guidance place limits or restrictions on use of this ingredient and some product‑verification programs will not allow it without proof of safety. Those restrictions mean the ingredient is subject to heavy controls in certain programs and uses.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium C14-16 Olefin Sulfonate
🚨6/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months) this ingredient is not ideal. It’s a relatively strong cleanser that can dry or irritate very delicate baby skin. There are also safety notes that manufacturers should limit how it’s used and check for a possible contaminant.
Organ Risk - Environment Canada lists this ingredient as “expected to be toxic or harmful” to non-reproductive organs and gives it a medium human-health priority. That means repeated or high exposures could hurt organs (for example liver, kidneys, or lungs). The regulatory review named in the ingredient file is the source of this concern (Environment Canada).
Cancer - The ingredient file flags contamination concerns, specifically the impurity gamma‑sultone, and the industry safety review (Cosmetic Ingredient Review, CIR) recommends limits on impurities. Impurities like gamma‑sultone can raise cancer-related worries, so this is a moderate contamination-linked cancer risk to be aware of.
Long-Term Risk - The same reviews note this ingredient is a medium human-health priority and that safety conclusions depend on concentration and use. The CIR also notes data gaps and concentration limits in its safety assessment. Together, these findings point to possible long-term health risks with repeated or high exposures.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium Hydroxide
🚨6/10
For infants and newborns (0–6 months): sodium hydroxide is a strong chemical that can burn or irritate when concentrated. In baby lotions and cleansers it is usually used in tiny amounts to set the product’s acidity and is neutralized in the finished product. Still, because babies have very thin, delicate skin, this ingredient is more worrisome for newborns than for older children or adults.
Banned - This ingredient is restricted for use in cosmetics in some regions. The EU cosmetics rules list limits on its use, and industry safety reviewers say it can only be used safely at certain low concentrations or when specially handled.
Organ Risk - Authorities have flagged possible harm to organs with repeated or high exposures. A national health agency classified it as expected to be toxic or harmful and gave it a medium human-health priority, and a U.S. assessment found toxic effects in animal studies. There is also limited evidence of breathing-related toxicity noted by a medical literature source.
Asthma - There is limited evidence that breathing in this chemical can hurt the lungs or airways. Medical literature notes possible respiratory toxicity, so it could make breathing problems worse if a child is exposed to vapor or mist.
Confidence: HIGH
Parfum Fragrance
🚨6/10
Premium Fragrance Oil is a vague term for fragrance blends that may contain allergens or irritants not disclosed. Fragrances often cause skin sensitivity in babies under 6 months.
Irritant - Fragrance mixtures often contain chemicals that can cause skin irritation, redness, or rashes, especially on sensitive baby skin.
Eczema - Fragrances are known triggers for eczema flare-ups and can worsen symptoms in babies with sensitive or atopic skin.
Asthma - Fragrance chemicals can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may worsen asthma or breathing issues in babies and children.
Hormones - Some fragrance ingredients, such as certain phthalates, are suspected endocrine disruptors that may interfere with hormone development.
Absorbed - Certain fragrance chemicals can be absorbed through the skin and detected in the bloodstream, raising concerns for systemic exposure.
Breast Milk - Some fragrance components, including phthalates, have been detected in breast milk, indicating they can pass from mother to baby.
Banned - Some fragrance ingredients are banned or restricted in the EU and other countries due to health concerns.
Builds Up - Certain fragrance chemicals, such as some phthalates and musks, can accumulate in the body over time with repeated exposure.
Long-Term Risk - Long-term exposure to some fragrance chemicals has been linked to chronic health effects, including hormone disruption and allergic diseases.
Confidence: HIGH
Ethyl Alcohol
⚠️5/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months) ethanol can be drying and may irritate delicate skin. Although overall hazard information is low, ethanol can increase absorption of other chemicals and a government source flags possible organ system effects, so it's best to be cautious with babies.
Organ Risk - Environment Canada classifies ethanol as “expected to be toxic or harmful” to non-reproductive organs and lists it as a medium human-health priority. That means repeated or heavy exposure (even from skin use) could hurt organs such as the liver or kidneys.
Long-Term Risk - The ingredient record notes non-reproductive organ-system toxicity at a low-to-moderate level and the Environment Canada classification implies possible effects from repeated or long-term exposure. This points to potential health effects after years of use.
Absorbed - Animal studies (published research in 2003 and 2006) show ethanol can act as a penetration enhancer and change how chemicals move through skin. That means topical ethanol can increase how much of itself or other ingredients get into the body.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Decyl Glucoside
⚠️4/10
For infants (0–6 months): Decyl Glucoside is a gentle cleansing ingredient that is usually safe, but a few babies have had skin reactions. Because newborn skin is extra delicate, I recommend being cautious.
Immune system - Human patch-test studies and clinical case reports have found that decyl glucoside can trigger allergic immune responses in some people. A 2020 UK/Ireland prevalence study and multiple patch-testing reports show possible immune or allergenic effects, so this ingredient can cause allergy-type reactions in sensitive children.
Eczema - Clinical case reports and patch testing have linked decyl glucoside and related alkyl glucosides to allergic contact dermatitis (skin rashes). Because these documented cases show true allergic skin reactions, the ingredient can trigger or worsen eczema in babies with sensitive skin.
Confidence: HIGH
PEG-12 Dimethicone
⚠️4/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months), PEG-12 Dimethicone is used to make lotions feel smooth. It is not commonly tied to cancer or allergy problems at normal use levels, but there are important contamination and manufacturing concerns that make extra caution wise for babies.
Cancer - The ingredient record shows a high contamination concern that lists ethylene oxide and 1,4‑dioxane as possible impurities. Those contaminants are linked with cancer risk, and industry safety reviews call out the need to limit impurities.
Banned - The record notes restrictions and that some industry/government guidance limits use or impurities. Contamination by cyclic siloxanes (cyclotetrasiloxane, cyclopentasiloxane) is listed — these chemicals have been heavily restricted in some places, so this ingredient may face similar limits unless manufacturers show it is free of those impurities (Cosmetic Ingredient Review / industry guidance).
Environmental - Cyclic siloxanes (D4, D5) are named among the contamination concerns. These kinds of siloxanes are a known environmental worry because they persist and move through ecosystems, and industry/government guidance has flagged them.
Builds Up - The ingredient's contamination list includes cyclic siloxanes that are known to accumulate in the environment and in organisms over time. The ingredient record and safety reviews call attention to those impurity risks.
Long-Term Risk - Because this ingredient can contain persistent or toxic impurities (for example D4/D5 cyclic siloxanes, ethylene oxide, 1,4‑dioxane), repeated or long-term use raises concern for lasting health effects. Industry safety assessments note data gaps and the need for limits on impurities (Cosmetic Ingredient Review).
Organ Risk - The contamination list includes chemicals (like 1,4‑dioxane and ethylene oxide) that have been linked to harm to organs with repeated exposure. The ingredient record highlights contamination as a high concern and industry reviews underscore the need to control such impurities.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Styrene Acrylates Copolymer
⚠️4/10
For newborns and babies (0–6 months): this ingredient is generally considered low risk in adults, but there are reports of possible impurities and little direct testing in infants. Because baby skin is more sensitive, take extra care.
Irritant - The ingredient record flags high contamination concerns, naming methacrylic acid and acrylic acid as possible contaminants. Those acids can irritate or burn skin, so a product that contains them by accident could cause redness or soreness on a baby’s skin. (Source: the ingredient safety record’s contamination listing.)
Eczema - The contamination list for this ingredient includes 2‑ethylhexyl acrylate, a substance often linked to allergic contact reactions in skin. If that contaminant is present, it can trigger or worsen eczema and rashes in sensitive children. (Source: the ingredient safety record’s contamination listing.)
Immune system - Because the ingredient file shows a high contamination concern with known sensitizing chemicals (for example, 2‑ethylhexyl acrylate), there is a real risk of allergic or immune reactions in some users. This comes from the ingredient safety record that lists these contaminant risks. (Source: the ingredient safety record’s contamination listing.)
Confidence: MEDIUM
Lactamide MEA
⚠️4/10
Lactamide MEA is not a well recognized ingredient and may be a misreading or typo of Acetamide MEA which is present. Cannot confirm safety for 0-6 months babies.
Confidence: HIGH
PEG-50 Shea Butter
⚠️4/10
PEG-50 Shea Butter is not a well defined ingredient and may be a misreading or typo. Cannot assess safety without clear identification.
Confidence: HIGH
Tris Tetramethylhydroxypiperidinol Citrate
⚠️4/10
Ingredient name unclear and not recognized in cosmetic or baby product databases might be a misreading or typo
Confidence: HIGH
Caprylyl Glycol
2/10
For infants (newborns and babies 0–6 months), Caprylyl Glycol is usually low risk when it’s in baby lotions, wipes, or creams at low amounts. Most babies won’t have a problem, but newborn skin is more sensitive so we recommend extra caution.
No Known Risk - Government and industry safety reviews found no clear health hazards for skin use. Tests say it is not likely to build up in the body, not persistent in the environment, and not harmful to organs. Industry reviewers do note limits on how much can be used and some data gaps, but overall the ingredient is rated low concern for topical use.
Confidence: HIGH
Glycerin
2/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): glycerin is a common, mild moisturizer found in many baby lotions and wipes. When used at normal levels in products made for babies, it is usually safe and well tolerated.
Confidence: HIGH
Butyrospermum Parkii Fruit
2/10
Shea butter is a natural plant fat that softens and protects baby skin. For infants (newborns, babies 0–6 months) it is usually safe when used sparingly on normal, dry skin.
No Known Risk - Shea butter is widely used in baby skincare products and is generally considered safe for topical use. There is no strong evidence linking it to irritation, allergies, hormone disruption, or other health risks in babies. Rare allergic reactions may occur, but these are uncommon and not specific to infants. Current research and regulatory guidance do not identify any significant risks for babies when shea butter is used topically.
Confidence: HIGH
Cocos Nucifera Oil
1/10
Coconut oil is generally safe for infant skin and is used as a moisturizer but monitor for rare allergies
No Known Risk - Coconut oil is widely used topically for babies and is generally considered safe. There is no strong evidence linking it to irritation, allergies, hormone disruption, cancer, or other health risks when used on healthy baby skin. Rare allergic reactions are possible, but not common enough to warrant a risk label based on current research.
Confidence: HIGH
Cocos Nucifera Coconut Oil
1/10
Cocos Nucifera Coconut Oil is very safe for 0-6 month babies in topical products like shampoo and bodywash. It is a common moisturizing ingredient.
Confidence: HIGH
Butyrospermum Parkii Shea Butter Fruit
1/10
Butyrospermum Parkii Shea Butter is a common moisturizing ingredient safe for babies 0-6 months in topical products like wipes and lotions. It likely provides skin hydration.
No Known Risk - Independent safety reviews (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) and a national environmental health agency (Environment Canada) found shea butter safe for use on skin and flagged only low-level concerns. They note it is generally safe for cosmetics, with some limits on concentration and manufacturing quality, and that there are a few data gaps in how safety limits are set. No clear evidence was found that it causes harm to organs, development, cancer, or strong immune problems at typical topical use levels, so no specific risk labels apply.
Confidence: HIGH
Aqua Water
0/10
Water is very safe for a newborn’s or baby’s skin. Tests and regulatory reviews find no meaningful health risks from water used on the skin.
No Known Risk - Regulatory reviews (Environment Canada) find plain water is not expected to be toxic, not bioaccumulative, and not an environmental toxin. Safety summaries list no concerns above a low level for organ harm, reproductive effects, or other long‑term risks for topical use, so no specific health risks are identified for use on skin.
Confidence: HIGH

Common Questions About CURLS & WAVES

Is this newborn-safe? CURLS & WAVES

CURLS & WAVES is not recommended for 0-6 month old babies due to potentially harmful ingredients.

What ingredients should I watch out for?

We analyzed 26 ingredients in CURLS & WAVES. 1 avoid, 11 concerning, 7 caution. Check the detailed analysis above for specific concerns.

When can newborns start using shampoo & bodywash & conditioner?

The appropriate age depends on the specific ingredients. This analysis is for 0-6 month old babies. Use the age selector above to check other ages.

⚠️ Important Disclaimers

Product Recognition: Product names are identified programatically and may be incorrect. Always verify product identity yourself.

Safety Analysis: Evaluations are for research only - consult pediatricians for medical decisions. Do not rely solely on this analysis.

No Guarantees: Results may be incomplete or inaccurate. Do not rely solely on this analysis.