GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY

baby powder • For 0-6 month old infantsSkin contact 🧴

baby powder

Product Images

Product Photo

GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY - Front

Tap to enlarge

Ingredient List

GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY - Ingredients

Tap to enlarge

Is this safe for 0-6 month old newborns to use GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY?

🚫
NO - AVOID
Danger Score: 70 (Lower is safer)
Quick Answer: GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY contains 23 ingredients. 3 avoid, 6 concerning, 2 caution. Avoid - Contains Dangerous Ingredients 🚫 Always consult your pediatrician for newborns.

Check for Different Age (6 available)

Ingredients Analysis (23 found)

hydrofluorocarbon 152a
🚫10/10
Not safe for infants and newborns (0–6 months). This is a propellant gas not meant for baby skin and is linked in official toxicology reports to developmental, immune, and hormonal concerns.
Banned - State product-safety rules list this chemical as banned or unsafe for use in cosmetics, so governments have restricted its use.
Forever Chemical - This compound belongs to a class of persistent fluorinated chemicals that experts flag as a group of long-lived 'forever' chemicals.
Builds Up - Toxicology reviews report that this chemical is persistent and can accumulate in people and wildlife over time.
Breast Milk - Health reviews note persistence and accumulation in humans, which means it can be found in body tissues and may pass into breast milk.
Immune system - A toxicological review identifies this chemical as a known human immune toxicant or allergen, so it can harm or change immune responses.
Fertility - Authoritative health profiles list this chemical as a known human reproductive and developmental toxin, so it can affect fertility and reproduction.
Brain Development - Scientific toxicology sources call this a developmental toxin in people, which can include effects on early growth and brain development.
Hormones - A toxicology assessment flags this chemical as a possible disruptor of the thyroid and other hormone systems, which can change normal hormonal development.
Confuse Hormones - Experts note this chemical may act like or interfere with natural hormones (a class-wide concern), so it can confuse the body's chemical signals.
Organ Risk - Health reviews and regulatory assessments report possible liver and cardiovascular toxicity in humans or animals after exposure.
Cancer - Toxicology documents list this chemical as a possible human carcinogen based on available evidence.
Absorbed - Product safety notes indicate enhanced skin absorption, so this chemical can get through skin and reach the body.
Environmental - Chemical-class reviews and toxicology profiles show persistence and bioaccumulation, meaning it can harm the environment and wildlife over time.
Long-Term Risk - Because the chemical is persistent, bioaccumulative, and linked to cancer, organ harm, and reproductive effects, it poses risks from long-term exposure.
Confidence: HIGH
alcohol denat.
🚫9/10
For infants and newborns (0-6 months) this ingredient is not recommended. It commonly dries and can irritate baby skin and may allow other ingredients to get into the body more easily.
Organ Risk - A government health agency reviewed this chemical and listed it as likely to be toxic or harmful to human health and gave it a medium concern for people. That means repeated or heavy exposure could hurt organs (for example liver or lungs) if someone gets enough of it over time.
Absorbed - Lab and animal studies show denatured alcohol can act as a penetration enhancer. In other words, it can help other chemicals pass through skin more easily, and it can increase how much gets into the body when used on skin (shown in mouse and rat studies). This raises the chance of chemicals getting into a baby’s bloodstream when products contain it.
Long-Term Risk - Regulators and industry reviews note this ingredient is used in many places (including some food uses) and that safety assessments rely on limits and have data gaps. Because people can meet this chemical from several products and sources, small exposures can add up over time and increase long-term risk.
Confidence: HIGH
benzethonium chloride
🚫8/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months) this ingredient is best avoided when possible. It’s an antiseptic that is allowed in some products but there are warnings and limits from health authorities and some animal and lab studies that suggest caution is needed for very young babies.
Banned - This ingredient faces formal limits in some countries. Health Canada and Japan impose restrictions or prohibitions for certain cosmetic uses, and an industry safety panel recommends safe concentration limits depending on where the product is applied. These regulatory actions mean some uses are limited by officials and safety reviewers.
Fertility - Animal studies on related quaternary ammonium compounds showed reduced fertility and reproductive effects in mice at moderate doses. These peer‑reviewed laboratory studies raise real concerns about effects on reproductive systems in mammals.
Hormones - Laboratory research has linked quaternary ammonium compounds like this one to interference with hormone‑related biology (for example, blocking steps in cholesterol and steroid production). That kind of interference is a form of endocrine disruption and can change how hormones work.
Immune system - Reviews and human exposure reports note limited but real evidence of immune and allergic reactions, including respiratory sensitivities, after exposure to quaternary ammonium compounds. That means some people may have allergy or immune responses to products containing this ingredient.
Asthma - There is limited human and review evidence that exposure to this class of disinfectant chemicals can affect the airways and worsen breathing issues. Health and toxicology reports flagged respiratory effects after exposure, so people with asthma or breathing problems may be more at risk.
Organ Risk - Some sources describe possible non‑reproductive organ toxic effects from exposure to quaternary ammonium compounds, while government reviews have given mixed findings. Because there is evidence pointing to potential organ toxicity in people and animals, repeated or high exposures could harm organs like the liver or lungs.
Confidence: HIGH
propylene carbonate
🚨7/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months: not recommended. This ingredient can irritate skin, eyes, and breathing and there isn’t strong safety data for very young babies.
Irritant - This ingredient is officially labeled as an irritant under EU GHS rules, and a cosmetic safety review (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) reports strong human evidence that it can irritate skin, eyes, or lungs. For babies, that can mean redness, stinging, rashes, or breathing irritation if inhaled. Industry reviews also note limits on how much may be safely used in products.
Confidence: HIGH
propylene glycol
🚨7/10
For newborns and babies (0–6 months): be cautious. Propylene glycol can irritate sensitive skin and helps other chemicals get through the skin. Babies’ skin is thinner, so they can be more affected.
Irritant - The U.S. National Library of Medicine lists this chemical as a skin, eye, and lung irritant. That means it can cause red, itchy skin, sting the eyes, or make breathing uncomfortable — risks that matter for babies and children with delicate skin and airways.
Immune system - A safety review by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review found limited evidence of skin and immune-system effects. This means some people can get allergic or immune reactions after skin contact.
Organ Risk - Environment Canada has classified this ingredient as expected to be toxic or harmful and of medium human-health priority for non-reproductive organ effects. Repeated or heavy exposure could pose risks to organs such as the liver, kidneys, or lungs.
Absorbed - The Cosmetic Ingredient Review identifies this ingredient as a penetration enhancer. It can help itself and other ingredients pass through the skin into the body, so more of the substance may get into the bloodstream.
Asthma - Because it can irritate the lungs (noted by the U.S. National Library of Medicine), inhaling sprays or vapors could make breathing problems or asthma worse in sensitive children.
Confidence: MEDIUM
C13-15 alkane
🚨6/10
C13-15 alkane is a skin-softening ingredient. For newborns and babies (0-6 months) it is not a clear-cut safe choice because regulators have flagged it for possible cancer risk and for increasing skin absorption. I treat it with caution for this age.
Cancer - This ingredient is labeled a possible human carcinogen under EU GHS hazard codes. That label means some authorities found links that could raise cancer risk after repeated or high exposure.
Organ Risk - The European Chemicals Agency has classified this substance as toxic or harmful to non-reproductive organ systems. That means repeated exposure could damage organs like the liver or kidneys.
Absorbed - Regulatory notes mention enhanced skin absorption for this ingredient. That means it can pass through the skin and reach the bloodstream, raising the chance the body sees any harmful effects.
Environmental - The European Chemicals Agency flags wildlife and environmental toxicity for this substance, meaning it can harm aquatic life and ecosystems if released into the environment.
Confidence: MEDIUM
aluminum starch octenylsuccinate
🚨6/10
For infants (0-6 months) this ingredient is generally considered low risk for cancer, allergies, and developmental harm in typical adult use, but there are notes about possible contamination and recommended limits. Because newborns and babies have very delicate skin and lungs, we treat it cautiously and do not recommend routine use on infants.
Environmental - An environmental regulator flagged this ingredient as an uncertain environmental toxin and the ingredient record also lists a specific contamination concern (CI 77000). An industry safety review recommends limits on impurities. Together, these sources indicate a real risk that impurities from this ingredient could harm the environment if released.
Confidence: MEDIUM
fragrance
🚨6/10
Premium Fragrance Oil is a vague term for fragrance blends that may contain allergens or irritants not disclosed. Fragrances often cause skin sensitivity in babies under 6 months.
Irritant - Fragrance mixtures often contain chemicals that can cause skin irritation, redness, or rashes, especially on sensitive baby skin.
Eczema - Fragrances are known triggers for eczema flare-ups and can worsen symptoms in babies with sensitive or atopic skin.
Asthma - Fragrance chemicals can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may worsen asthma or breathing issues in babies and children.
Hormones - Some fragrance ingredients, such as certain phthalates, are suspected endocrine disruptors that may interfere with hormone development.
Absorbed - Certain fragrance chemicals can be absorbed through the skin and detected in the bloodstream, raising concerns for systemic exposure.
Breast Milk - Some fragrance components, including phthalates, have been detected in breast milk, indicating they can pass from mother to baby.
Banned - Some fragrance ingredients are banned or restricted in the EU and other countries due to health concerns.
Builds Up - Certain fragrance chemicals, such as some phthalates and musks, can accumulate in the body over time with repeated exposure.
Long-Term Risk - Long-term exposure to some fragrance chemicals has been linked to chronic health effects, including hormone disruption and allergic diseases.
Confidence: HIGH
isopropyl myristate
🚨6/10
For babies 0–6 months old (newborns, infants) this ingredient is best avoided when possible. It can make skin more likely to absorb other substances and has been linked to some cases of contact allergy. Overall health risks are low in adults, but infants have thinner, more absorbent skin, so we are more cautious.
Absorbed - Laboratory research shows isopropyl myristate can act as a penetration enhancer and help other substances pass through the skin (a study tested transdermal permeation). That means it can increase how much gets into a child’s body when used on the skin.
Irritant - Published human case reports have linked isopropyl myristate to allergic contact dermatitis (skin redness, itching, or rash) after use. These are real, documented skin reactions in people.
Immune system - Case studies report allergic reactions to this ingredient, showing it can trigger the immune system in some people and lead to sensitization or allergic responses.
Eczema - Because it has been reported to cause contact dermatitis in humans, isopropyl myristate may trigger or worsen eczema or similar skin conditions in sensitive children.
Confidence: MEDIUM
stearalkonium hectorite
⚠️5/10
For newborns and babies (0-6 months): the ingredient itself does not show strong signals of causing cancer or developmental problems, but there are known contamination worries (chemicals called nitrosamines and free amines) and a lack of clear testing for babies. Because infants absorb substances more easily and may lick treated skin, I recommend being cautious.
Cancer - The ingredient record flags high contamination concerns, specifically nitrosamines and free amines. Nitrosamines are a class of contaminants that are linked to cancer risk, and the ingredient assessment calls these contaminants out as a high concern. Industry safety reviewers also note gaps in how safe concentrations are set, which adds to the uncertainty.
Long-Term Risk - Contaminants named in the assessment (nitrosamines and free amines) can cause harm over repeated exposure, and an industry safety review (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) notes data gaps and implicit limits based on past use rather than clear safety margins. That combination raises the chance of long-term health effects with repeated use.
Environmental - Environment Canada lists this substance as an uncertain environmental toxin, meaning it may harm wildlife or ecosystems and the environmental effects are not well understood.
Confidence: MEDIUM
isohexadecane
⚠️4/10
For newborns and babies (0–6 months): this ingredient is usually used to make skin feel smooth and is considered low-risk for adults, but babies have very thin, sensitive skin so we are more careful. It’s not commonly listed as a major hazard, but some experts note possible irritation and some regulatory groups have raised concerns about organ effects in other settings.
Organ Risk - Government chemical reviews (Environment Canada and the European Chemicals Agency) have flagged isohexadecane as toxic or potentially harmful to non-reproductive organs. That means repeated or high exposures could harm organs such as the liver or kidneys. One industry review allows limited use with conditions, but the government classifications show a real organ-level concern.
Environmental - A national environmental agency (Environment Canada) lists isohexadecane as a suspected environmental toxin. This means it may hurt fish, plants, or other wildlife if it gets into water or soil, even though it is not thought to build up in animals.
Confidence: MEDIUM
aloe barbadensis leaf juice
3/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): aloe vera leaf juice is usually low risk in small amounts, but babies this young have very sensitive skin. It may cause irritation in some infants and industry safety reviews recommend using it only within set limits.
Confidence: MEDIUM
bisabolol
3/10
Soothing agent and fragrance. Low toxicity and low sensitization at typical levels, but infants may be sensitive. Likely used for anti irritation and mild scent.
Confidence: MEDIUM
hydroxyethyl urea
3/10
Hydroxyethyl urea is a moisturizing ingredient that experts generally consider low risk for adults. For infants (newborns and babies under 6 months) there is little specific testing, so while risk appears low, we recommend being careful because baby skin is more sensitive.
No Known Risk - Safety reviews by an independent cosmetic safety panel found no health concerns above a low level. The panel concluded the ingredient is safe for cosmetic use when formulated correctly and at appropriate concentrations, and common concerns such as cancer, reproductive harm, and allergies were all rated low. Irritation was noted but not found to be above low. Because no issue exceeded a low concern in the available safety assessments, there are no known higher-level risks.
Confidence: LOW
isododecane
3/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months, isododecane is best treated with caution. Adults show low risk overall, but there is little information about babies and some studies suggest possible irritation and, at high doses, effects on organs or nerves in animals.
Confidence: MEDIUM
magnesium stearate
3/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months): magnesium stearate is commonly used in creams and powders and is seen as low concern for most people. However, there is limited specific safety testing in newborns, so extra caution is recommended.
No Known Risk - Government and industry safety reviews say this ingredient poses low concern. The U.S. food agency lists it as safe for limited food use, Environment Canada calls it not expected to be toxic and a low human-health priority, and the cosmetic safety panel reviewed it (with some data gaps). Taken together, these sources show no clear health risks for typical topical use.
Confidence: LOW
acrylates/octylacrylamide copolymer
2/10
For newborns and babies up to 6 months: the available safety information shows low concerns for serious long-term effects, but there is not much research specifically in very young babies. Because infant skin is very sensitive, treat this ingredient with caution.
No Known Risk - Current ingredient assessments show no concerns above low for this substance. Reviews list cancer, allergy/immune effects, developmental or reproductive harm, and use restrictions all at low concern, so there are no identified real risks for typical skin use in children.
Confidence: MEDIUM
glycerin
2/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): glycerin is a common, mild moisturizer found in many baby lotions and wipes. When used at normal levels in products made for babies, it is usually safe and well tolerated.
Confidence: HIGH
menthyl lactate
2/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): generally safe in small amounts on intact skin. It can give a mild cooling feeling and, rarely, cause mild irritation in very sensitive babies.
No Known Risk - Safety reviews by regulatory bodies find this ingredient okay for limited use and do not flag any health hazards. Experts concluded it is not expected to harm organs, does not build up in the body, and is not thought to persist or damage the environment. Based on those assessments, there are no real risks identified that would affect a child with normal topical use.
Confidence: HIGH
sodium bicarbonate
2/10
For newborns and young babies (0–6 months), sodium bicarbonate is generally low risk when used in small amounts in products made for babies. It is widely used in foods and cosmetics and is considered unlikely to cause long-term harm. Because babies have very sensitive, thin skin and tend to put things in their mouths, we stay extra cautious.
No Known Risk - Government and industry safety reviews find no clear hazards for normal topical use. The U.S. FDA allows limited food uses; Environment Canada says it is not expected to be toxic or to build up in the body; an industry safety panel notes some data gaps and sets safe use limits but does not identify a health risk when used as intended. Based on these assessments, there are no known health risks for typical topical use.
Confidence: HIGH
tapioca starch
2/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months, tapioca starch is generally low risk on the skin but needs extra care because it is a fine powder. The chance of skin harm is small, but powders can irritate eyes or be breathed into tiny lungs.
Confidence: MEDIUM
zingiber officinale root extract
2/10
For newborns and young infants (0–6 months), this plant extract is generally very gentle on skin when used correctly. The main thing to watch is rare, mild skin irritation.
No Known Risk - Current studies show very low concern for skin use. A major food safety group allows it in some foods, and only limited skin allergy reports exist. For normal use on skin, it is not expected to harm babies or kids.
Confidence: MEDIUM
maltodextrin
1/10
Maltodextrin is generally safe for newborns and young babies when used on normal, unbroken skin in creams or lotions. It is not known to cause cancer or serious harm and has a low chance of causing an allergic reaction.
No Known Risk - Government and independent reviews find this ingredient safe for typical use. The U.S. food safety agency lists it as allowed for food, and a Canadian health agency says it is not expected to be toxic and is a low human-health priority. A cosmetic expert panel notes only routine limits on concentration or impurities. There are no identified health concerns above low for cancer, allergies, reproduction, or organ damage in the available assessments.
Confidence: HIGH

Common Questions About GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY

Is this newborn-safe? GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY

GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY is not recommended for 0-6 month old babies due to potentially harmful ingredients.

What ingredients should I watch out for?

We analyzed 23 ingredients in GOLD BOND CLEAR BODY POWDER SPRAY. 3 avoid, 6 concerning, 2 caution. Check the detailed analysis above for specific concerns.

When can newborns start using baby powder?

The appropriate age depends on the specific ingredients. This analysis is for 0-6 month old babies. Use the age selector above to check other ages.

⚠️ Important Disclaimers

Product Recognition: Product names are identified programatically and may be incorrect. Always verify product identity yourself.

Safety Analysis: Evaluations are for research only - consult pediatricians for medical decisions. Do not rely solely on this analysis.

No Guarantees: Results may be incomplete or inaccurate. Do not rely solely on this analysis.