Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion

lotion • For 0-6 month old infants • Skin contact 🧴

lotion

Product Images

Product Photo

Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion - Front

Tap to enlarge

Ingredient List

Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion - Ingredients

Tap to enlarge

Is this safe for 0-6 month old newborns to use Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion?

🚫
NO - AVOID
Danger Score: 35 (Lower is safer)
Quick Answer: Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion contains 25 ingredients. 4 concerning, 9 caution. Concerning - Has Problematic Ingredients ⚠️ Always consult your pediatrician for newborns.

Ingredients Analysis (25 found)

Phenoxyethanol
🚨7/10
For infants (0–6 months): be careful. This preservative can irritate delicate baby skin and some countries limit how it’s used. It is not known to cause cancer or birth defects at normal cosmetic levels, but irritation is the main concern.
Irritant - Official hazard listings show this chemical can cause skin, eye, and lung irritation. Regulators classify it as an irritant, so it can make skin red or itchy and bother the eyes or breathing passages.
Asthma - Because it can irritate the lungs, it may make asthma or breathing problems worse. Workplace and hazard listings note lung irritation and limits on inhalation exposure.
Organ Risk - There is limited evidence that it can affect the nervous system and it is listed as toxic/harmful in official hazard codes. That means repeated or high exposures could harm organs like the nervous system.
Absorbed - Safety reviews and workplace data note systemic effects tied to how it is used, and nervous-system findings suggest the chemical can get into the body after skin or workplace exposure.
Banned - Some governments set limits on its use in cosmetics (for example, concentration limits from national health authorities), and some product standards require special proof before it can be used.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Fragrance
🚨6/10
Premium Fragrance Oil is a vague term for fragrance blends that may contain allergens or irritants not disclosed. Fragrances often cause skin sensitivity in babies under 6 months.
Irritant - Fragrance mixtures often contain chemicals that can cause skin irritation, redness, or rashes, especially on sensitive baby skin.
Eczema - Fragrances are known triggers for eczema flare-ups and can worsen symptoms in babies with sensitive or atopic skin.
Asthma - Fragrance chemicals can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may worsen asthma or breathing issues in babies and children.
Hormones - Some fragrance ingredients, such as certain phthalates, are suspected endocrine disruptors that may interfere with hormone development.
Absorbed - Certain fragrance chemicals can be absorbed through the skin and detected in the bloodstream, raising concerns for systemic exposure.
Breast Milk - Some fragrance components, including phthalates, have been detected in breast milk, indicating they can pass from mother to baby.
Banned - Some fragrance ingredients are banned or restricted in the EU and other countries due to health concerns.
Builds Up - Certain fragrance chemicals, such as some phthalates and musks, can accumulate in the body over time with repeated exposure.
Long-Term Risk - Long-term exposure to some fragrance chemicals has been linked to chronic health effects, including hormone disruption and allergic diseases.
Confidence: HIGH
Sodium Hydroxide
🚨6/10
For infants and newborns (0–6 months): sodium hydroxide is a strong chemical that can burn or irritate when concentrated. In baby lotions and cleansers it is usually used in tiny amounts to set the product’s acidity and is neutralized in the finished product. Still, because babies have very thin, delicate skin, this ingredient is more worrisome for newborns than for older children or adults.
Banned - This ingredient is restricted for use in cosmetics in some regions. The EU cosmetics rules list limits on its use, and industry safety reviewers say it can only be used safely at certain low concentrations or when specially handled.
Organ Risk - Authorities have flagged possible harm to organs with repeated or high exposures. A national health agency classified it as expected to be toxic or harmful and gave it a medium human-health priority, and a U.S. assessment found toxic effects in animal studies. There is also limited evidence of breathing-related toxicity noted by a medical literature source.
Asthma - There is limited evidence that breathing in this chemical can hurt the lungs or airways. Medical literature notes possible respiratory toxicity, so it could make breathing problems worse if a child is exposed to vapor or mist.
Confidence: HIGH
Steareth-21
🚨6/10
For newborns and babies 0-6 months: use caution. The ingredient itself is not strongly linked to cancer or long-term harms, but there are concerns about contamination during manufacturing and it can sometimes irritate skin or eyes. Baby skin is very delicate, so avoiding this ingredient when possible is safest.
Cancer - The ingredient record lists high contamination concerns for ethylene oxide and 1,4‑dioxane as possible manufacturing impurities. Those contaminants are known by public health authorities to be linked to cancer, so contaminated batches of this ingredient could raise a cancer risk.
Environmental - A government environmental agency flagged this ingredient as a suspected environmental toxin. That means it may harm fish, plants, or other wildlife if released to the environment.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Betaine
⚠️5/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months: Betaine is a moisturizing ingredient used in some lotions and wipes. Most safety reviews find low risk for cancer or developmental harm, but there are noted risks of contamination with industrial pollutants and some reports of mild skin or eye irritation. Because babies’ skin is very delicate, I recommend a cautious approach.
Cancer - The ingredient's contamination listing names dioxins, PAHs and PCBs as possible impurities. Those contaminants are known to raise cancer risk, so if the ingredient is contaminated there is a real cancer concern (based on the ingredient's contamination listing).
Organ Risk - Lead and some of the listed contaminants (for example PCBs) can harm organs such as the brain, liver and kidneys in children. The ingredient's contamination listing includes lead, so organ damage is a possible hazard if contamination occurs.
Long-Term Risk - High contamination concerns plus note that the ingredient may be used in food or as an additive mean repeated or combined exposures could lead to long-term health problems over time (this is noted in the ingredient profile and the FDA-related exposure note).
Builds Up - The contamination profile lists chemicals (PCBs and dioxins) that are known to accumulate in body fat. If those contaminants are present, they can build up in a child’s body with repeated use (based on the ingredient's contamination listing).
Breast Milk - Some contaminants named in the ingredient's contamination listing (for example dioxins and PCBs) are known to pass into breast milk. That means contaminated exposure could reach nursing infants (based on the ingredient's contamination listing).
Environmental - The listed possible impurities (PCBs, dioxins, PAHs) are persistent pollutants that can harm the environment. Their presence as contamination is flagged in the ingredient profile, so there is an environmental concern if they are present.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Disodium EDTA
⚠️5/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months): this ingredient is often used in tiny amounts to keep products stable. It is not linked to cancer or reproductive problems at normal low levels, but it can irritate skin and eyes and may help other ingredients get through the skin more easily. Because baby skin is very thin, use extra caution.
Irritant - This ingredient is marked as an irritant for skin, eyes, or lungs under EU GHS hazard labeling. The data calls out a high irritation concern, so it can cause redness, stinging, or breathing irritation—especially on sensitive baby skin.
Absorbed - An industry safety review (Cosmetic Ingredient Review, CIR) lists this chemical as a penetration enhancer. That means it can help other things get through the skin and can itself be absorbed into the body.
Organ Risk - Environment Canada has flagged non-reproductive organ-system toxicity for this substance, including notes that it can be harmful and is a medium human-health priority. That suggests repeated or high exposures could affect organs like the liver or kidneys.
Long-Term Risk - Because the ingredient can enhance skin absorption and has non-reproductive organ toxicity listings, repeated use raises concern for longer-term health effects. Industry reviews also note data gaps and concentration limits, meaning long-term safety depends on how much and how often it is used (Cosmetic Ingredient Review).
Confidence: MEDIUM
Dimethicone
⚠️4/10
Safety information not properly formatted for easy understanding
Builds Up - Regulators have said some forms are persistent and can bioaccumulate in people and wildlife. A REACH substance evaluation and Environment Canada findings name persistence and bioaccumulation as a concern, so this ingredient (or its related siloxanes) can build up over time.
Environmental - Environment Canada flagged this chemistry as suspected to harm the environment. The same evaluations note persistence in wildlife, meaning it can stay in nature and affect animals and ecosystems.
Organ Risk - An assessment by Environment Canada classified non-reproductive organ system toxicity as a concern, meaning repeated exposure may harm organs (for example, liver or kidneys) according to that regulator.
Banned - Some related siloxanes listed as contaminants (for example, cyclopentasiloxane / cyclotetrasiloxane and similar substances) have been heavily restricted by regulators under REACH and by other national reviews. Industry safety reviews also recommend limits or product-type restrictions.
Long-Term Risk - Because parts of this class are persistent and regulators and industry panels recommend use limits, there is a potential for long-term harms from repeated use or environmental build-up, as noted in REACH and Cosmetic Ingredient Review summaries.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Ethylhexylglycerin
⚠️4/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): this ingredient is not among the most dangerous, but it can sometimes cause skin or eye irritation and has been linked to allergic rashes in people. Because babies have very delicate skin, we recommend being careful.
Irritant - The ingredient is classed as an irritant by EU hazard labeling and safety reviewers. Animal studies also show skin, eye and lung irritation. That means it can cause redness, stinging, sore eyes, or breathing discomfort if used on or near a child’s skin or eyes.
Immune system - Human case reports and safety reviews describe allergic contact dermatitis from this ingredient and call it a relevant sensitizer in some cosmetics. This shows it can trigger allergic reactions in sensitive children.
Eczema - Because there are human reports of allergic contact dermatitis, this ingredient can start or make eczema and similar skin rashes worse in children who are sensitive.
Asthma - Animal studies reviewed by safety assessors show respiratory irritation at moderate doses. If the ingredient is inhaled (for example from sprays), it could make breathing issues or asthma worse in susceptible children.
Organ Risk - Safety assessments and animal studies report liver effects at low doses and limited eye toxicity. These findings point to possible harm to organs with repeated or higher exposure.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Niacinamide
⚠️4/10
Niacinamide is a mild form of vitamin B3 that is usually low risk. For newborns and babies (0–6 months) we recommend being careful because their skin soaks up things more easily.
No Known Risk - Major government and expert reviews find niacinamide to be low risk for normal topical use. A national environmental health agency classifies it as not expected to be harmful to organs or the environment. The U.S. food regulator allows limited uses in food, and an independent cosmetic safety panel has set recommended concentration limits after review. While a few animal studies at very high doses reported tumor findings and reviewers note some data gaps about maximum ‘as-used’ concentrations, the overall conclusion from these agencies and safety panels is that routine topical use poses no significant known health risks.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Paraffinum Liquidum
⚠️4/10
Mineral oil is a common baby moisturizer and can protect skin, but for newborns and babies 0–6 months there are some reasons to be careful. Studies and regulatory reviews have noted possible buildup of some mineral-oil components in body tissues and some people can have allergic or breathing reactions.
Immune system - There is evidence that mineral oil can act as an allergen or harm the immune system. Health review groups and medical literature list it as a possible immune or allergic toxicant, and workplace guidance notes strong evidence for immune effects in people.
Asthma - Mineral oil has been identified as a human respiratory allergen/toxicant, which means it can make breathing problems or asthma worse for some people. Occupational health sources report strong links to respiratory effects.
Organ Risk - Regulatory health assessments classify mineral oil as expected to be toxic or harmful to organs with repeated exposure, and list it as a medium human health priority for non-reproductive organ effects.
Builds Up - Research studies found mineral oil hydrocarbons accumulating in animal and human tissues, showing this ingredient can build up in the body over time.
Absorbed - Because mineral oil hydrocarbons have been measured inside body tissues, they can be absorbed into the body from topical use and not stay only on the skin.
Long-Term Risk - Given its tendency to accumulate in tissues and classifications showing organ toxicity concern, there is a potential for long-term health effects with repeated exposure over time.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium Ascorbyl Phosphate
⚠️4/10
For infants (0–6 months): this is a form of vitamin C used on the skin and is generally considered low-risk in adults. However, there is little direct information for newborns and babies, so we recommend being careful with products that contain it.
No Known Risk - Safety reviews find only low-level concerns for cancer, allergies, and reproductive or developmental harm. The main notes are industry-set limits on how much can be used and some data gaps flagged by the cosmetic industry safety panel (CIR). There is no clear evidence of harm at typical topical use, so currently no known health risk for children from this ingredient.
Confidence: LOW
Titanium Dioxide
⚠️4/10
For infants (0-6 months) titanium dioxide in creams or lotions is generally low risk on normal, unbroken skin because it does not easily soak in. But tiny particles or sprays can be breathed in and are the main concern. For very young babies, be extra careful.
Cancer - Some public health agencies list titanium dioxide as a possible human carcinogen and report limited evidence that it can cause cancer in people. This comes from international cancer-review and U.S. public health evaluations, which is why cancer is a real concern with repeated or high exposures.
Organ Risk - A national health agency has classified titanium dioxide as likely to be toxic or harmful to body organs and placed it as a medium human-health priority. That means repeated or high exposure could hurt organs such as the lungs or other non-reproductive systems.
Long-Term Risk - Because it is linked to possible cancer and to medium-priority organ toxicity by health agencies, titanium dioxide carries a risk from long-term or repeated exposure over years.
Confidence: HIGH
Tocopheryl Acetate
⚠️4/10
Usually fine in tiny amounts on a newborn’s healthy skin, but infants are extra sensitive. Some babies can react, and there are concerns about tiny impurities in some sources.
Irritant - A cosmetic safety review panel (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) found strong human evidence that this can trigger skin allergy. That means it may cause redness, itch, or rash, especially on sensitive baby skin.
Immune system - Moderate concern for allergy and immune reactions on skin was flagged by a cosmetic safety panel (Cosmetic Ingredient Review). Some kids may have an immune response like hives or swelling.
Absorbed - Tests note enhanced skin absorption for this form of vitamin E. This means a small amount can pass through the skin and enter the body after use.
Long-Term Risk - There is a high concern for a trace impurity (hydroquinone). European health regulators and other agencies restrict that impurity because of safety worries with long-term use.
Environmental - Environment Canada lists it as a suspected environmental toxin, though data are limited. It may harm water life if it builds up in waterways.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate Crosspolymer
✅2/10
For infants (0–6 months): generally low risk. This ingredient is a thickener that usually does not get into the skin, but there are notes that trace manufacturing contaminants (methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, benzene) can be present. Because babies’ skin is very delicate, we recommend extra caution.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Cetyl Alcohol
✅2/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): cetyl alcohol is usually safe when used in small amounts in baby products. It helps creams feel smooth and rarely causes reactions, but baby skin is extra sensitive and some experts want more safety data.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Cetyl Palmitate
✅2/10
For babies 0–6 months (newborns and infants) cetyl palmitate is generally low risk and is used to soften and thicken lotions and wipes. Most reviews find low concern for long‑term harm, but infant skin is more sensitive so we take extra care.
No Known Risk - Reviews by an industry safety panel and a government assessment found only low-level concerns (mainly possible mild skin, eye, or lung irritation) and noted some data gaps. The government review did not find signs of organ harm, persistence, or buildup in the body. Because all health concerns were rated low and no stronger hazards were reported for normal topical use, there are no known meaningful risks for typical use. Note: some product verification programs ask for extra safety documentation before allowing this ingredient.
Confidence: HIGH
Glycerin
✅2/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): glycerin is a common, mild moisturizer found in many baby lotions and wipes. When used at normal levels in products made for babies, it is usually safe and well tolerated.
Confidence: HIGH
Silica
✅2/10
Silica is used as an absorbent or anti-caking agent and is generally considered safe for topical use but data for infants under 6 months is limited
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium Starch Octenylsuccinate
✅2/10
For infants (newborns and babies 0–6 months), this ingredient is generally considered low risk. Reviews by government and industry bodies say it is not expected to be toxic. Still, because babies’ skin is very delicate, I recommend being cautious.
No Known Risk - Government and industry safety reviews found this ingredient is not expected to be toxic to organs, the environment, or to cause cancer, allergy, or reproductive harm. Those reviews note only low-level concerns and advise limits on concentration or purity in products, but they do not identify a health risk when the ingredient is used as intended.
Confidence: HIGH
Stearic Acid
✅2/10
Stearic acid is a common ingredient in baby creams and wipes and is generally low risk. Reviews by government and industry experts find little evidence it causes cancer, strong allergic reactions, or harm to development. Because newborn skin is very delicate, we err on the side of caution for babies under 6 months.
Confidence: HIGH
Vitis vinifera seed Oil
✅2/10
Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil is grape seed oil used as an emollient. Generally safe but rare allergies possible in infants under 6 months.
No Known Risk - Grape seed oil is widely used in baby skincare products and is generally considered safe for topical use. There is no strong evidence linking it to irritation, allergies, hormone disruption, or other health risks in babies. It is not known to be absorbed in harmful amounts, nor is it associated with long-term or systemic risks based on current research.
Confidence: HIGH
Calcium Pantothenate
✅1/10
Very low risk. As a form of vitamin B5, this ingredient is generally safe for babies and newborns when it’s used in normal amounts in baby lotions and creams.
No Known Risk - Government and expert reviews find no meaningful hazards for this topical ingredient. The U.S. FDA allows limited uses, Environment Canada classifies it as not expected to be toxic, persistent, or to build up in the body, and industry reviewers note only routine limits on concentration or impurities. No higher-than-low health concerns (such as cancer, hormone disruption, or organ harm) were identified.
Confidence: HIGH
Maltodextrin
✅1/10
Maltodextrin is generally safe for newborns and young babies when used on normal, unbroken skin in creams or lotions. It is not known to cause cancer or serious harm and has a low chance of causing an allergic reaction.
No Known Risk - Government and independent reviews find this ingredient safe for typical use. The U.S. food safety agency lists it as allowed for food, and a Canadian health agency says it is not expected to be toxic and is a low human-health priority. A cosmetic expert panel notes only routine limits on concentration or impurities. There are no identified health concerns above low for cancer, allergies, reproduction, or organ damage in the available assessments.
Confidence: HIGH
Pyridoxine HCl
✅1/10
Pyridoxine HCl is vitamin B6 used as a skin conditioning agent topical use is considered very safe for infants
No Known Risk - Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6) is widely used in topical products and is generally recognized as safe for use on baby skin. There is no strong evidence linking it to irritation, hormone disruption, cancer, or other health risks when used topically. No major health authorities have flagged it as a risk for babies in topical applications.
Confidence: HIGH
Water
✅0/10
Water is very safe for a newborn’s or baby’s skin. Tests and regulatory reviews find no meaningful health risks from water used on the skin.
No Known Risk - Regulatory reviews (Environment Canada) find plain water is not expected to be toxic, not bioaccumulative, and not an environmental toxin. Safety summaries list no concerns above a low level for organ harm, reproductive effects, or other long‑term risks for topical use, so no specific health risks are identified for use on skin.
Confidence: HIGH

Common Questions About Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion

Is this newborn-safe? Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion

Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion is not recommended for 0-6 month old babies due to potentially harmful ingredients.

What ingredients should I watch out for?

We analyzed 25 ingredients in Myra Classic Moisturizing Vitamin Lotion. 4 concerning, 9 caution. Check the detailed analysis above for specific concerns.

When can newborns start using lotion?

The appropriate age depends on the specific ingredients. This analysis is for 0-6 month old babies. Use the age selector above to check other ages.

⚠️ Important Disclaimers

Product Recognition: Product names are identified programatically and may be incorrect. Always verify product identity yourself.

Safety Analysis: Evaluations are for research only - consult pediatricians for medical decisions. Do not rely solely on this analysis.

No Guarantees: Results may be incomplete or inaccurate. Do not rely solely on this analysis.