VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced

shampoo & bodywash & conditioner • For 0-6 month old infantsSkin contact 🧴

shampoo & bodywash & conditioner

Product Images

Product Photo

VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced - Front

Tap to enlarge

Ingredient List

VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced - Ingredients

Tap to enlarge

Is this safe for 0-6 month old newborns to use VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced?

🚫
NO - AVOID
Danger Score: 82 (Lower is safer)
Quick Answer: VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced contains 45 ingredients. 3 avoid, 9 concerning, 13 caution. Avoid - Contains Dangerous Ingredients 🚫 Always consult your pediatrician for newborns.

Check for Different Age (6 available)

Ingredients Analysis (45 found)

Caffeine
🚫8/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months), it's safest to avoid putting products that contain caffeine on their skin. Babies absorb more through their skin and their bodies are still developing, so even ingredients that are low risk for adults may be riskier for infants.
Absorbed - Safety reviews note that topical caffeine can be absorbed through skin. That means some caffeine put on the skin can get into the bloodstream after use, so the body may be exposed beyond the skin (noted in cosmetic safety assessments).
Organ Risk - Some regulatory reviews have classified caffeine as potentially harmful to organs and animal tests showed deaths at high doses. This flag comes from a chemical agency review and cosmetic safety studies that reported harmful effects in animals at high exposures.
Fertility - Animal studies found effects on development or reproduction at moderate doses in safety testing. These findings from cosmetic safety reviewers mean there is evidence caffeine can affect reproductive or developmental health in animals under some conditions.
Builds Up - Peer‑reviewed studies report that caffeine can persist and bioaccumulate in wildlife. That means it can build up in animals and the environment over time rather than breaking down quickly.
Environmental - Independent research shows caffeine can persist in the environment and accumulate in wildlife, which can harm ecosystems. Some government reviews differ, but peer‑reviewed evidence raised environmental concerns.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Citral
🚫8/10
Citral is a scent ingredient found in perfumes and some plant oils. For newborns and babies (0-6 months) it is more likely to irritate the skin or cause an allergic reaction because their skin is very delicate. It’s safest to avoid it in this age group.
Irritant - This ingredient is classified as a skin, eye and general irritant by EU GHS hazard labels and is reported to cause irritation of skin, eyes and lungs. That means it can cause redness, stinging or sore eyes and skin reactions on sensitive baby skin.
Immune system - Regulatory sources (the EU Cosmetics Directive) and industry guidance (IFRA) list this chemical as a known human allergen or immune-system toxicant. Peer-reviewed reports also show evidence it can trigger immune reactions, so it can provoke allergic responses in some children.
Eczema - Because it is a known skin allergen and irritant (noted by EU cosmetic rules and fragrance industry reports), it can trigger or worsen eczema and similar skin conditions in people who are sensitive.
Asthma - Lung and respiratory irritation are reported in hazard listings (EU GHS), so inhaling or exposure to this ingredient could make breathing problems or asthma worse in sensitive children.
Confidence: HIGH
Limonene
🚫8/10
Limonene is a citrus fragrance ingredient that can irritate newborn and infant skin and can cause allergies, especially after it has been exposed to air and oxidizes. For babies 0–6 months, it’s safer to avoid it.
Immune system - This ingredient is listed as a known human allergen and has multiple regulatory flags for immune-system effects (EU cosmetics and hazard labeling rules, and US regulatory listings). That means it can trigger allergic reactions or other immune effects in some people, including children.
Eczema - Experts and regulatory lists identify this chemical as a skin allergen and sensitizer (EU hazard and cosmetics notices). For babies or kids with sensitive skin or a history of eczema, it can trigger or worsen rash and contact dermatitis.
Irritant - Hazard classifications name this ingredient as a skin and general irritant (EU GHS hazard codes). It can cause redness, stinging, or eye and lung irritation if it touches or is breathed in.
Cancer - The ingredient record flags contamination concerns with formaldehyde. Formaldehyde is classified as a carcinogen by international cancer authorities, so contamination raises a potential cancer-related risk if present.
Builds Up - Some environmental assessments and peer-reviewed studies list this chemical as persistent and bioaccumulative in wildlife (OSPAR and scientific literature), meaning it can build up in the environment and animals over time.
Environmental - Regulatory hazard listings and ecological reviews note possible harm to wildlife and the environment (EU hazard codes and environmental assessments). This means its release or repeated use can be harmful to ecosystems.
Confidence: HIGH
Amyl Cinnamal
🚨7/10
Amyl Cinnamal is a fragrance allergen with strong sensitization risk not recommended for infants under 6 months often used for scent
Irritant - Amyl Cinnamal is a known skin irritant, especially for sensitive skin such as that of babies. It can cause redness, itching, or rashes upon topical exposure.
Eczema - Because Amyl Cinnamal can trigger allergic reactions and skin irritation, it may also worsen or trigger eczema in sensitive individuals, including babies.
Confidence: HIGH
Lactic Acid
🚨7/10
For infants (0-6 months), lactic acid can increase skin sensitivity and may be more likely to irritate or let other things through the skin. Because newborn skin is thin and still developing, it is safer to avoid products with lactic acid unless a pediatrician tells you to use one.
Banned - This ingredient is restricted in some places and must follow rules about how it is made and used. A Canadian safety list and government guidance limit its use, and industry safety panels set rules on how much can be in products.
Absorbed - This acid can help other things pass through the skin and can get into the body more easily. A safety review paper lists it as a penetration enhancer, so it may raise how much of a product is absorbed.
Sun Burn - Industry safety guidance says it can raise the skin's sensitivity to the sun unless products are made to prevent that or directions tell you to use sun protection.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Linalool
🚨7/10
For newborns and babies (0–6 months): linalool is a fragrance ingredient that can cause skin allergies and irritation. Because babies’ skin is very delicate, it’s safer to avoid it when possible.
Immune system - This ingredient is listed as a known human allergen and a possible immune-system toxicant in official cosmetic safety reviews (European cosmetics rules) and is flagged with strong evidence by the U.S. regulator. That means it can trigger allergic reactions or immune responses in some children.
Irritant - Official cosmetic guidance requires labeling for this ingredient because it can cause allergic skin reactions. The safety reviews identify it as a human allergen, so it can cause redness, itching, or rashes on sensitive baby skin.
Eczema - Because this ingredient is a known allergen and can provoke skin reactions, it may trigger or make eczema and similar skin conditions worse in susceptible children.
Cancer - A contamination concern was specifically flagged for formaldehyde being associated with this ingredient. Formaldehyde is recognized in safety summaries as a harmful contaminant linked to cancer risk, so contamination raises a cancer-related concern.
Confidence: HIGH
Polyquaternium-7
🚨7/10
For infants and newborns (0–6 months), this ingredient is best avoided when possible. There is limited information for babies this young and some official reviews raise contamination and restriction concerns.
Cancer - The ingredient record flags contamination with acrylamide. Acrylamide is a toxic contaminant and its presence in the ingredient raises a real cancer concern reported in the safety record.
Organ Risk - A government assessment listed this polymer as expected to be toxic or harmful to non-reproductive organs, indicating possible harm to organs like liver, kidneys, or lungs with repeated exposure.
Banned - This ingredient is restricted for use in cosmetics under the EU Cosmetics Directive and is limited by industry safety rules, so it may be banned or heavily limited in some countries or products.
Environmental - Government data flagged this substance as a suspected environmental toxin, suggesting it may harm wildlife or ecosystems if released.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Chlorella Vulgaris Extract
🚨6/10
Safety information not properly formatted for easy understanding
Organ Risk - A safety review and product-restriction note flags high contamination concerns for arsenic and lead in this ingredient. Arsenic and lead are known to harm organs like the liver and kidneys with repeated exposure, so contaminated batches could pose organ damage risk to children using products on their skin.
Long-Term Risk - The same safety review highlights high contamination by toxic metals (arsenic, lead). These metals are linked to health problems that appear after years of exposure, so repeated use of products with contaminated extract could raise long-term health concerns.
Builds Up - The ingredient is noted for contamination with metals such as lead and arsenic. These metals can build up in the body over time when people are exposed repeatedly, so ongoing use could lead to accumulation in a child’s body.
Absorbed - This extract is used on the skin and the safety summary lists iodine, arsenic, and lead contamination. Toxic metals on the skin can be absorbed into the body, so topical use could let these contaminants enter a child’s bloodstream.
Banned - A product-verification program and safety assessment place restrictions on this ingredient and state it cannot be included in verified products without strong supporting data. That restriction signals regulatory caution or limits on its use in vetted products.
Confidence: LOW
Lauramidopropyl Betaine
🚨6/10
Safety information not properly formatted for easy understanding
Immune system - An expert safety review noted limited evidence that this ingredient can cause immune or allergic reactions. The same safety panel flagged allergies and immune effects as a concern (rated above low), so people with sensitive skin or known allergies could react.
Irritant - The safety assessment and expert report list limited evidence of allergy and skin reactions tied to this ingredient and related compounds. That means it can cause redness, itch, or contact dermatitis in some people, especially on sensitive baby skin.
Banned - Cosmetic safety reviewers and a product verification program have placed restrictions on use and require limits or proof for including this ingredient in certified products. An expert panel specifically recommended use or concentration limits, which signals regulatory caution.
Long-Term Risk - The ingredient record flags high contamination concerns: specific impurities (for example, 3‑dimethylaminopropylamine and related amines) were identified. Impurities can create risks over time with repeated exposure, so long-term safety depends on manufacturing controls.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium C14-16 Olefin Sulfonate
🚨6/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months) this ingredient is not ideal. It’s a relatively strong cleanser that can dry or irritate very delicate baby skin. There are also safety notes that manufacturers should limit how it’s used and check for a possible contaminant.
Organ Risk - Environment Canada lists this ingredient as “expected to be toxic or harmful” to non-reproductive organs and gives it a medium human-health priority. That means repeated or high exposures could hurt organs (for example liver, kidneys, or lungs). The regulatory review named in the ingredient file is the source of this concern (Environment Canada).
Cancer - The ingredient file flags contamination concerns, specifically the impurity gamma‑sultone, and the industry safety review (Cosmetic Ingredient Review, CIR) recommends limits on impurities. Impurities like gamma‑sultone can raise cancer-related worries, so this is a moderate contamination-linked cancer risk to be aware of.
Long-Term Risk - The same reviews note this ingredient is a medium human-health priority and that safety conclusions depend on concentration and use. The CIR also notes data gaps and concentration limits in its safety assessment. Together, these findings point to possible long-term health risks with repeated or high exposures.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium Hydroxide
🚨6/10
For infants and newborns (0–6 months): sodium hydroxide is a strong chemical that can burn or irritate when concentrated. In baby lotions and cleansers it is usually used in tiny amounts to set the product’s acidity and is neutralized in the finished product. Still, because babies have very thin, delicate skin, this ingredient is more worrisome for newborns than for older children or adults.
Banned - This ingredient is restricted for use in cosmetics in some regions. The EU cosmetics rules list limits on its use, and industry safety reviewers say it can only be used safely at certain low concentrations or when specially handled.
Organ Risk - Authorities have flagged possible harm to organs with repeated or high exposures. A national health agency classified it as expected to be toxic or harmful and gave it a medium human-health priority, and a U.S. assessment found toxic effects in animal studies. There is also limited evidence of breathing-related toxicity noted by a medical literature source.
Asthma - There is limited evidence that breathing in this chemical can hurt the lungs or airways. Medical literature notes possible respiratory toxicity, so it could make breathing problems worse if a child is exposed to vapor or mist.
Confidence: HIGH
Fragrance Parfum
🚨6/10
Premium Fragrance Oil is a vague term for fragrance blends that may contain allergens or irritants not disclosed. Fragrances often cause skin sensitivity in babies under 6 months.
Irritant - Fragrance mixtures often contain chemicals that can cause skin irritation, redness, or rashes, especially on sensitive baby skin.
Eczema - Fragrances are known triggers for eczema flare-ups and can worsen symptoms in babies with sensitive or atopic skin.
Asthma - Fragrance chemicals can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may worsen asthma or breathing issues in babies and children.
Hormones - Some fragrance ingredients, such as certain phthalates, are suspected endocrine disruptors that may interfere with hormone development.
Absorbed - Certain fragrance chemicals can be absorbed through the skin and detected in the bloodstream, raising concerns for systemic exposure.
Breast Milk - Some fragrance components, including phthalates, have been detected in breast milk, indicating they can pass from mother to baby.
Banned - Some fragrance ingredients are banned or restricted in the EU and other countries due to health concerns.
Builds Up - Certain fragrance chemicals, such as some phthalates and musks, can accumulate in the body over time with repeated exposure.
Long-Term Risk - Long-term exposure to some fragrance chemicals has been linked to chronic health effects, including hormone disruption and allergic diseases.
Confidence: HIGH
Water Aqua Eau
⚠️5/10
Water Aqua Eau is simply water used as a solvent and carrier in baby products. It is very safe and essential in shampoos and bodywashes for babies 0-6 months.
Confidence: HIGH
Benzoic Acid
⚠️4/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months: benzoic acid is a preservative with low concerns in broad safety reviews, but expert panels limit how it can be used in products. Babies’ skin is delicate, so we should be cautious.
Banned - Some regulators limit how benzoic acid can be used in cosmetics. A national health agency in Japan sets concentration limits for its use, and a cosmetic safety review group says it can only be used under specific concentration or product-type rules. Because of these legal and industry limits, products may be restricted or not allowed unless makers follow those rules.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Citric Acid
⚠️4/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months), citric acid is generally low risk for long‑term harm but can irritate sensitive baby skin or eyes. It is used to balance acidity in many products, but special care is needed for very young babies.
Banned - Health Canada has placed restrictions on the use, concentration, or manufacturing of citric acid in cosmetics in Canada. An industry safety panel (Cosmetic Ingredient Review) also says safe use depends on product concentration and notes data gaps, so makers must limit or document how they use it. Because of these government and industry limits, some safety-verification programs will not allow this ingredient in products without proof it is used safely.
Confidence: HIGH
Coco-Glucoside
⚠️4/10
Coco‑Glucoside is a gentle, plant‑based cleanser. For infants (newborns, babies 0–6 months) it is usually low risk when used at normal levels in baby shampoos and washes, but very young skin is more easily irritated or sensitized.
Immune system - Human patch-testing studies and case reports show that coco‑glucoside and related alkyl glucosides can cause allergic reactions in some people. Reviews and clinical reports (including a 2019 patch‑testing study and a 2014 case report, plus a 2004 review of alkyl polyglycosides) document possible immune/allergic effects.
Eczema - There are published clinical cases of allergic contact dermatitis tied to alkyl glucosides, meaning this ingredient can trigger or worsen eczema‑like skin reactions in sensitive individuals (reported in a 2014 case report and supported by later patch‑testing findings).
Confidence: HIGH
Decyl Glucoside
⚠️4/10
For infants (0–6 months): Decyl Glucoside is a gentle cleansing ingredient that is usually safe, but a few babies have had skin reactions. Because newborn skin is extra delicate, I recommend being cautious.
Immune system - Human patch-test studies and clinical case reports have found that decyl glucoside can trigger allergic immune responses in some people. A 2020 UK/Ireland prevalence study and multiple patch-testing reports show possible immune or allergenic effects, so this ingredient can cause allergy-type reactions in sensitive children.
Eczema - Clinical case reports and patch testing have linked decyl glucoside and related alkyl glucosides to allergic contact dermatitis (skin rashes). Because these documented cases show true allergic skin reactions, the ingredient can trigger or worsen eczema in babies with sensitive skin.
Confidence: HIGH
Lauryl Glucoside
⚠️4/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): this is a mild cleansing ingredient and is usually low risk, but babies’ skin is very delicate so there’s a small chance it can irritate or rarely cause an allergic reaction.
Immune system - Human patch-test reports and case studies show that alkyl glucosides, including lauryl glucoside, have caused allergic or immune reactions in some people. A review and specific patch-test studies (2014 and 2019) note possible immune or allergenic effects in certain users, so there is a real chance this ingredient can trigger immune responses in sensitive children.
Eczema - There are documented human case reports of allergic contact dermatitis from alkyl glucosides (reported in patch-testing studies from 2014 and 2019). That means lauryl glucoside can trigger or worsen eczema or similar skin rashes for some people with sensitive skin.
Fertility - A toxicology review of alkyl polyglycosides (2004) reports animal studies where male reproductive effects occurred at moderate doses. While this is from animal data, it indicates a possible risk to reproductive health that should be noted.
Confidence: HIGH
Niacinamide
⚠️4/10
Niacinamide is a mild form of vitamin B3 that is usually low risk. For newborns and babies (0–6 months) we recommend being careful because their skin soaks up things more easily.
No Known Risk - Major government and expert reviews find niacinamide to be low risk for normal topical use. A national environmental health agency classifies it as not expected to be harmful to organs or the environment. The U.S. food regulator allows limited uses in food, and an independent cosmetic safety panel has set recommended concentration limits after review. While a few animal studies at very high doses reported tumor findings and reviewers note some data gaps about maximum ‘as-used’ concentrations, the overall conclusion from these agencies and safety panels is that routine topical use poses no significant known health risks.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Propanediol
⚠️4/10
For newborns and babies (0-6 months) propanediol is not usually thought to be highly toxic, but it can make skin absorb other things more and has been linked to skin irritation in some studies. Because babies’ skin is very delicate, I recommend being cautious.
Irritant - Propanediol has been linked to skin, eye, or lung irritation. It is listed as a skin irritant by the U.S. National Library of Medicine, and both the European chemical regulator and a cosmetics safety review report limited evidence of irritation. This means it can cause redness, itching or rashes—especially on sensitive baby skin.
Absorbed - Propanediol is noted as a penetration enhancer by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review. That means it can help itself or other ingredients move through the skin and into the body, increasing the chance of absorption into the bloodstream.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Tetrasodium Glutamate Diacetate
⚠️4/10
For newborns and babies (0-6 months) this ingredient is usually low concern in small amounts, but we are cautious because of possible contamination and limited safety data. If possible, choose products made for infants that avoid this ingredient.
Cancer - A U.S. environmental agency reported limited evidence that this ingredient can act as a mutagen. Mutagen findings raise concern because they can be linked to cancer risk with repeated or high exposure.
Organ Risk - A cosmetic safety review noted animal studies that showed changes in organ weights for mothers and their offspring at high doses. That points to possible harm to organs with repeated or large exposures.
Fertility - The same cosmetic safety review found evidence from animal studies of effects on mothers and offspring at high doses, which suggests possible developmental or reproductive effects.
Irritant - A European chemical agency found limited evidence this ingredient can irritate skin and eyes, and the ingredient file also notes possible irritation to skin, eyes or lungs. This can cause redness, stinging or discomfort on sensitive baby skin.
Absorbed - The ingredient record flags enhanced skin absorption. That means it can get through the skin and into the body more easily, raising the chance that the other risks above could reach internal organs.
Long-Term Risk - The ingredient file flags high contamination concerns (including chemicals such as nitrilotriacetic-type impurities) and also notes data gaps in safety testing. Contamination plus incomplete safety data raise concern for possible long-term health effects if exposure is repeated.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Propanediol Caprylate
⚠️4/10
Propanediol Caprylate is not a well recognized ingredient name and may be a misreading or typo. Cannot confirm safety for 0-6 months babies.
Confidence: HIGH
Sodium Methyl 2-Sulfolaurate
⚠️4/10
Cannot understand what Sodium Methyl 2-Sulfolaurate is it might be a misreading or a typo not a recognized ingredient
Confidence: HIGH
Disodium 2-Sulfolaurate
⚠️4/10
Disodium 2-Sulfolaurate is not a recognized ingredient in cosmetic or baby care products it may be a misreading or typo of a similar surfactant
Confidence: HIGH
CIO-16 Alcohols
⚠️4/10
CIO-16 Alcohols is not a recognized ingredient name it may be a misreading or typo cannot assess safety accurately
Confidence: HIGH
Butylene Glycol
3/10
Butylene glycol is usually safe and helps moisturize and texture products. For newborns and babies (0–6 months) the main worry is skin or eye irritation. Long-term risks are rated low, but babies can have very sensitive skin so extra care is needed.
Confidence: HIGH
Callicarpa Japonica Fruit Extract
3/10
For infants (0–6 months): this plant extract is generally considered low risk in public ingredient listings, but there’s almost no direct safety research in newborns. Because baby skin is very delicate, we recommend being careful and treating it as a cautious-use ingredient for babies.
No Known Risk - Current ingredient safety reviews list only low-level concerns for cancer, allergies/immune effects, and developmental or reproductive harm, and no use restrictions were identified. For topical use, these reviews did not find higher risks or warnings, so there are no known health risks based on the available safety summaries.
Confidence: LOW
Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine
3/10
For newborns and babies (0–6 months): this ingredient is generally considered low risk, but there are important manufacturing impurity concerns and a small chance of mild skin or eye irritation. Because babies have very delicate skin, take extra care.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Rheum Rhaponticum Root Extract
3/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months: this root extract is likely low risk in general, but we don’t have much data on very young babies. Their skin is more sensitive, so treat it as potentially irritating.
No Known Risk - Available safety summaries for this root extract report only low-level concerns for cancer, allergies/immune effects, developmental or reproductive harm, and use limits when used on the skin. No higher-level hazards were identified in those reviews, so there are no specific risks flagged for child use based on the current information.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium Benzoate
3/10
For newborns and babies 0–6 months: sodium benzoate is a preservative that is generally considered low risk at the small amounts used in skin products, but infant skin is delicate so we take extra care.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium Lauryl Sulfoacetate
3/10
For infants and newborns (0–6 months): this ingredient is generally considered low risk in safety listings, but baby skin is very delicate. Use extra caution and choose products made for babies.
No Known Risk - Available safety reviews and government assessments do not identify any health hazards above a low level for skin use. Experts classify it as unlikely to harm organs, unlikely to persist or build up in the body, and not expected to be an environmental toxin. Industry safety panels note limits on how much can be used and say more data would help, but no specific child health risks were found.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Disodium Cocoyl Glutamate
2/10
For newborns and babies (0–6 months), this is generally a gentle cleansing ingredient with low safety concerns in adults, but babies’ skin is more sensitive and there’s limited data for this exact age. Use caution.
No Known Risk - A professional cosmetics review found this ingredient safe for use in personal care products when used in normal amounts. A European chemical agency noted only limited evidence of eye irritation, and overall expert reviews rate health concerns as low. Because experts consider the risks minor at typical use levels, there are no meaningful risks for children when the ingredient is used as intended.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Epilobium Angustifolium Leaf Extract
2/10
For infants (0–6 months), this plant extract is generally low risk according to the provided ingredient profile. It’s used on the skin and is not linked to major hazards in the data you were given. Still, babies’ skin is delicate, so we keep a cautious approach.
No Known Risk - Current safety summaries rate all flagged concerns (cancer, allergies/immunity, and developmental or reproductive effects) as low for this topical plant extract, and there are no listed use restrictions or higher-level hazards. Given that no concerns rise above low, there are no identified real risks for children when this ingredient is used as intended.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Glycerin
2/10
For newborns and infants (0–6 months): glycerin is a common, mild moisturizer found in many baby lotions and wipes. When used at normal levels in products made for babies, it is usually safe and well tolerated.
Confidence: HIGH
Polyquaternium-73
2/10
For infants (newborns and babies 0–6 months): this ingredient is generally considered low risk in cosmetics, but there is limited testing specifically in very young babies. Because babies’ skin is thinner and more sensitive, it’s safest to be cautious.
No Known Risk - A cosmetic ingredient safety review found this ingredient is considered safe for use in cosmetics with some limits. The same review rated cancer, allergy/immune, and developmental/reproductive concerns as low. There is a note that it may cause skin or eye irritation, but the evidence is limited. Given these safety findings at typical cosmetic uses, no clear health risks were identified.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Sodium Starch Octenylsuccinate
2/10
For infants (newborns and babies 0–6 months), this ingredient is generally considered low risk. Reviews by government and industry bodies say it is not expected to be toxic. Still, because babies’ skin is very delicate, I recommend being cautious.
No Known Risk - Government and industry safety reviews found this ingredient is not expected to be toxic to organs, the environment, or to cause cancer, allergy, or reproductive harm. Those reviews note only low-level concerns and advise limits on concentration or purity in products, but they do not identify a health risk when the ingredient is used as intended.
Confidence: HIGH
Sodium Sulfate
2/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months): sodium sulfate is generally low risk. It’s a simple salt used in small amounts in shampoos and washes and is not known to cause serious harm. Baby skin is very soft and can react more easily, though, so we use extra caution.
No Known Risk - Reviews by government and independent safety panels find no meaningful hazards for normal topical or food uses. Studies show low concern for cancer, allergies, developmental harm, and organ effects; it does not build up in the body and is not considered an environmental toxin. One animal test saw harm only at much higher doses than people would get. Overall experts rate the concerns as low, so no specific risks are identified for typical use.
Confidence: HIGH
Sclerocarya Birrea Seed Oil
2/10
Marula oil is a plant oil that is generally low risk. For newborns and infants (0-6 months) the data is limited, so treat it with caution. Most babies will not have a problem, but very young skin is more sensitive than older children or adults.
No Known Risk - Available ingredient reviews list only low-level concerns for cancer, allergies/immune effects, developmental or reproductive effects, and for use restrictions. No higher-level hazards were identified for topical use, so there are no real health risks for children from typical use of this ingredient.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Biotin
1/10
For newborns and babies (0-6 months), biotin in baby lotions or wipes at low levels is generally considered low risk when used as directed. It rarely causes skin irritation or allergy and is not expected to build up in the body.
No Known Risk - Current safety reviews show no health concerns above a low level for topical biotin at normal product uses. U.S. food regulators list it as safe for limited use, cosmetic safety reviewers note data gaps but base safety on reported product concentrations, and a Canadian health agency found it unlikely to harm organs, to persist or to build up in the body, or to be an environmental toxin. No higher-level risks were identified in the available assessments.
Confidence: HIGH
Epilobium Angustifolium Flower Extract
1/10
Epilobium Angustifolium Flower Extract is a plant extract used for soothing skin and is generally safe in topical baby products like shampoo and bodywash for 0-6 months babies.
No Known Risk - Epilobium Angustifolium Flower Extract (Willowherb) is generally considered safe for topical use, with no well-documented evidence of causing irritation, hormone disruption, or other health risks in babies. There are no studies linking it to eczema, asthma, or other long-term health concerns. Therefore, based on current research, no immediate health concerns are found for this ingredient.
Confidence: HIGH
Epilobium Angustifolium Stem Extract
1/10
Epilobium Angustifolium Stem Extract is a plant extract with anti-inflammatory properties and low irritation risk, suitable for gentle baby skin care products like shampoo and bodywash.
No Known Risk - Epilobium Angustifolium Stem Extract (Willowherb) is generally considered safe for topical use, with no evidence in scientific literature linking it to irritation, hormone disruption, cancer, or other health risks in babies. There are no reports of it being banned or restricted, and it is not known to be absorbed in harmful amounts through the skin. Therefore, no risk labels apply based on current research.
Confidence: HIGH
Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride
1/10
For infants (0-6 months), this ingredient is generally low risk when used in small amounts, especially in rinse-off products like baby shampoo. It can cause mild irritation in some people, so we recommend being cautious with newborns and babies.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Hydroxypropyl Cyclodextrin
1/10
For newborns and infants (0-6 months) this ingredient is generally low risk when it is part of a finished lotion or cream made for babies. It is not a common cause of serious problems in baby skincare.
No Known Risk - Current safety reviews and regulatory notes report only low-level concerns for this topical ingredient and do not identify higher-level hazards for children. A cosmetic ingredient safety panel has suggested limits or documentation for use in some products, but no clear evidence shows real health harm at normal product levels. Because no concerns above low have been reported, there are no known risks identified.
Confidence: MEDIUM
Panthenol
1/10
Panthenol (provitamin B5) is generally safe for infants and newborns. It helps moisturize and soothe baby skin and is rarely irritating. Studies and government reviews do not show it to be toxic when used on skin.
No Known Risk - Health and regulatory reviews (including Canadian and U.S. assessments and industry safety panels) find panthenol has no reported hazards above a low level for topical use. It is not expected to harm organs, does not appear to build up in the body or the environment, and common concerns (cancer, allergies, reproductive effects) were rated low. There are some industry notes about safe use levels and a few data gaps, but no higher-level health risks were identified.
Confidence: HIGH
Sodium Chloride
1/10
For infants and newborns (0-6 months) this ingredient is generally safe when used in the small amounts found in baby wipes, creams, and saline drops. It is the same simple salt used in food and is not considered toxic in these low amounts.
No Known Risk - Regulatory reviews flag no meaningful health hazards for topical use. Food and health authorities list it as safe for limited use, and environmental assessments find it unlikely to harm organs, build up in the body, or damage wildlife. Overall expert sources rate concerns as low across cancer, allergies, development, and use restrictions.
Confidence: HIGH

Common Questions About VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced

Is this newborn-safe? VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced

VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced is not recommended for 0-6 month old babies due to potentially harmful ingredients.

What ingredients should I watch out for?

We analyzed 45 ingredients in VEGAMOUR GRO+ Advanced. 3 avoid, 9 concerning, 13 caution. Check the detailed analysis above for specific concerns.

When can newborns start using shampoo & bodywash & conditioner?

The appropriate age depends on the specific ingredients. This analysis is for 0-6 month old babies. Use the age selector above to check other ages.

⚠️ Important Disclaimers

Product Recognition: Product names are identified programatically and may be incorrect. Always verify product identity yourself.

Safety Analysis: Evaluations are for research only - consult pediatricians for medical decisions. Do not rely solely on this analysis.

No Guarantees: Results may be incomplete or inaccurate. Do not rely solely on this analysis.